Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2018
12th International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018)
Article Number 05001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Creep-Fatigue Interactions / Fatigue at Very High Temperatures
Published online 25 May 2018
  1. U.S. Department of Energy, “International Energy Outlook 2005,” (2005). [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Trygg and S. Amir, “European perspective on absorption cooling in a combined heat and power system-A case study of energy utility and industries in Sweden,” Appl. Energy, vol. 84, no. 1319, (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Saidur, E. A. Abdelaziz, A. Demirbas, M. S. Hossain, and S. Mekhilef, “A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2262–2289, Jun. (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. G. Tumanovskii et al., “Review of the coal-fired, over-supercritical and ultra-supercritical steam power plants,” Therm. Eng., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 83–96, Feb. (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. YIN and Z. WU, “Corrosion Behavior of TP316L of Superheater in Biomass Boiler with Simulated Atmosphere and Deposit,” Chinese J. Chem. Eng., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 849–853, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Blum and R. Vanstone, “Materials Development for Boilers and Steam Turbines Operating At 700 ° C,” Proc. 6th Int. Charles Parsons Turbine Conf. Dublin, Irel., pp. 498–510, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  7. Eurelectric, “Flexible generation: Backing up renewables,” Eurelectric, Brussels, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Dietrich, J. M. Latorre, L. Olmos, and A. Ramos, “The Role of Flexible Demands in Smart Energy Systems,” in Energy System, pp. 79–97, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Hales, “A Quantitative Metallographic Assessment of Structural Degradation of Type 316 Stainless Steel During Creep–Fatigue,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 339–356, (Oct. 1980). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. W. J. Plumbridge, “Uprating and life assessment under fatigue-creep conditions,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., vol. 59, no. 1–3, pp. 119–129, (Jan. 1994). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. ASTM, “Creep-Fatigue Testing,” E2714 - 13. ASTM International, pp. 1–15, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Jetter, “Subsection NH–Class 1 Components in Elevated Temperature Service,” in Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Third Edition, Three Park Avenue New York, NY 10016-5990: ASME, pp. 409–445, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Chai, M. Boström, M. Olaison, and U. Forsberg, “Creep and LCF Behaviors of Newly Developed Advanced Heat Resistant Austenitic Stainless Steel for A-USC,” Procedia Eng., vol. 55, no. 55, pp. 232–239, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. L. H. De Almeida, I. Le May, and P. R. O. Emygdio, “Mechanistic modeling of dynamic strain aging in austenitic stainless steels,” Mater. Charact., vol. 41, pp. 137–150, (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Chai, “Damage Mechanism of Low Cycle Fatigue in an Advanced Heat Resistant Austenitic Stainless Steel at High Temperature,” Procedia Mater. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 1754–1759, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R. P. Skelton and D. Gandy, “Creep – fatigue damage accumulation and interaction diagram based on metallographic interpretation of mechanisms,” Mater. High Temp., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 27–54, (Mar. 2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.