Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 154, 2018
The 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Technology for Sustainable Development (ICET4SD 2017)
Article Number 03017
Number of page(s) 5
Section Computer Sciences
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815403017
Published online 28 February 2018
  1. ITGI. Board briefing on IT governance 2nd edition. IT Governance Institute (2003) [Google Scholar]
  2. NGC. IT governance: Developing a successful governance strategy. National Computing Centre (2005) [Google Scholar]
  3. ITGl. COBIT 4.1. IT Governance Institute (2007) [Google Scholar]
  4. ISACA. COBIT 5: A business framework for the governance and management of enterprise IT. ISACA (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. OGC. ITIL service strategy version 3. Office of Government Commerce (2007) [Google Scholar]
  6. TSO. ITIL Service Strategy 2011 edition. The Stationery Office (2011). [Google Scholar]
  7. ISO. ISO/IEC 20000-1: Information technology – Service management – Part 1: Service management system requirements. International Organization for Standardization (2011) [Google Scholar]
  8. ISO. ISO/IEC 38500: Corporate governance of information technology. International Organization for Standardization (2008) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Röglinger, J. Pöppelbuß, J. Becker. Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), pp. 328-346 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Rosemann, T. De Bruin. Application of a holistic model for determining BPM maturity. BP Trends, February 2005, pp. 1-21 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Siponen. Towards maturity of information security maturity criteria: six lessons learned from software maturity criteria. Information Management & Computer Security, 10(5), pp. 210-224 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  12. V.A. Canal. ISM3 1.0. Information security management maturity model. Institute for Security and Open Methodologies (2004) [Google Scholar]
  13. SEI. CMMI for development version 1.3 Technical report CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033. Software Engineering Institute (2010) [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Dirgahayu, D. Ariyadi, Assessment to COBIT 4.1 maturity model based on process attributes and control objectives. Proc. 2015 Int. Conf. Science in Information Technology, pp. 343-347 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Pederiva. The COBIT maturity model in a vendor evaluation case. Information Systems Control Journal, 3, pp. 26-29 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Simonsson, P. Johnson, H. Wijkström. Modelbased IT governance maturity assessments with COBIT. Proc. European Conf. Information Systems, pp 1276-1287 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Walker, T. McBride, G. Basson, R. Oakley. ISO/IEC 15504: Measurement applied to COBIT process maturity. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(2), 159-176 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. W. Van Grembergen. The balanced scorecard and IT governance. IRMA Conference, pp. 1123-1124 (2000) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.