Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 154, 2018
The 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Technology for Sustainable Development (ICET4SD 2017)
Article Number 01065
Number of page(s) 4
Section Engineering and Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815401065
Published online 28 February 2018
  1. Ministry of Industry, Roadmap Industri Pengolahan Kelapa, Directorate of Agricultural and Chemistry Department, Indonesia, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  2. Board of Agricultural Research and Development, Prospek dan Arah Pengembangan Agribisnis Kelapa, Departemen Pertanian. Indonesia, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  3. Rostykus, W., Winnie, I., Mallon, J., Musculoskeletal Disorders: Five Common Management Approach, Professional Safety, Vol. December 2013: 35-42, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaebernick, H., Farmer, L.E, Mozar, S., Concurrent Product and Process Design, The University of New South Wales, USA, (1996) [Google Scholar]
  5. Anuraj, N.P., Srinivasa, V. Ravichandran, Design of a Food Trolley for Hospital India, SASTECH Journal, Vol. 12: 90-98, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  6. Mohanty, P.P. & Mahaptra, S.S., Design Of Office Chair: A Quality Function Deployment Approach, Journal of Advanced Materials Manufacturing and Characterization, Vol 3.: 520-523, (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Prasad, K. & Chakraborty, S. A., Quality Function Deployment-Based Model for Materials Selection, Journal of Materials & Designs, Vol. 49: 525-535, (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Widodo, Y. & Ikatrinasari, Z.F., Implementasi Quality Function Deployment Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk Lift, Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, Vo.2., No.3: 195-203, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  9. Moldovan, L., QFD Employment for a New Product Design of a Mineral Water Company, Procedia Technology, Vol. 12: 462-468, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mustakim. Integrasi Quality Function Deployment dan KANO Guna Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Produk Gunting Multifungsi. Widya Teknika, Vol. 23, No.1: 21-28, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. Kassela, K., Papalexi, M., Bamford, D., Applying Quality Function Deployment to Social Housing, The TQM Journal, Vol. 29. Issue.3 : 422-437, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moody, A.K., Lal, R.R., Pandey, V., Analysis of Customer Oriented Product Development with Quality Function Deployment, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Vol. 8, Issue 5: 270-279, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. Caligiana, G., Liverani, A., Francia, D., Frizziero, L., Donnici, G., Integrating QFD and TRIZ for Innovative Design, Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing, Vol. 11., No. 2: 1-15, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ikmar, S.B.S. & Firdaus, M.B.I., Implementation of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in Design Anti-Theft Motorcycle Device, Journal of Mechanical Manufacturing, Vol. 1: 132-146, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. Battistoni, E., Colladon, A.F., Scarabotti, L., Schiraldi, M.M., Analytical Hierarchy Process for New Product Development, International Journal of Engineering Business Management, Vol.5, No.42: 1-8, (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Walden, J., Performance Excellence: A QFD Approach, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 20, Issue 1: 123-133, (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cohen, L., Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You, Addison-Wesley, Michigan, (1995) [Google Scholar]
  18. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, (1988) [Google Scholar]
  19. Mulyono, S., Teori Pengambilan Keputusan, Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, (1996) [Google Scholar]
  20. Davoodi, A., On Inconsistency of a Pairwise Comparison Matrix, International Journal of Industrial Mathematics, Vol. 4: 343-350, (2009) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.