Open Access
Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 154, 2018
The 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Technology for Sustainable Development (ICET4SD 2017)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01002 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Engineering and Technology | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815401002 | |
Published online | 28 February 2018 |
- de Lasa, H., et al., Catalytic Steam Gasification of Biomass: Catalysts, Thermodynamics and Kinetics. Chemical Reviews, 2011. 111(9): p. 5404-5433. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Balu, E., U. Lee, and J.N. Chung, High temperature steam gasification of woody biomass – A combined experimental and mathematical modeling approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015. 40(41): p. 14104-14115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Naqvi, M., et al., An experimental study on hydrogen enriched gas with reduced tar formation using pre-treated olivine in dual bed steam gasification of mixed biomass compost. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016. 41(25): p. 10608-10618. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Guan, Y., et al., Steam catalytic gasification of municipal solid waste for producing tar-free fuel gas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009. 34(23): p. 9341-9346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Adnan, M.A., et al., Enhancement of hydrogen production in a modified moving bed downdraft gasifier – A thermodynamic study by including tar. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017. 42(16): p. 10971-10985. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Adnan, M.A., et al., Feed compositions and gasification potential of several biomasses including a microalgae: A thermodynamic modeling approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017. 42(27): p. 17009-17019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia, L., et al., CO2 as a gasifying agent for gas production from pine sawdust at low temperatures using a Ni/Al coprecipitated catalyst. Fuel Processing Technology, 2001. 69(2): p. 157-174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Billaud, J., et al., Influence of H2O, CO2 and O2 addition on biomass gasification in entrained flow reactor conditions: Experiments and modelling. Fuel, 2016. 166: p. 166-178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, Y., Z. Thow, and C.-H. Wang, Biomass gasification with CO2 in a fluidized bed. Powder Technology, 2016. 296: p. 87-101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- López-González, D., et al., Kinetic analysis and thermal characterization of the microalgae combustion process by thermal analysis coupled to mass spectrometry. Applied Energy, 2014. 114: p. 227-237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ali, S.A.M., S.A. Razzak, and M.M. Hossain, Apparent kinetics of high temperature oxidative decomposition of microalgal biomass. Bioresource Technology, 2015. 175: p. 569-577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kebelmann, K., et al., Intermediate pyrolysis and product identification by TGA and Py-GC/MS of green microalgae and their extracted protein and lipid components. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2013. 49: p. 38-48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Soreanu, G., et al., CO2 gasification process performance for energetic valorization of microalgae. Energy, 2017. 119: p. 37-43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Shabbar, S. and I. Janajreh, Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of coal gasification using Gibbs energy minimization method. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013. 65: p. 755-763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Peters, L., et al., CO2 removal from natural gas by employing amine absorption and membrane technology—A technical and economical analysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011. 172(2-3): p. 952-960. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chaiwatanodom, P., S. Vivanpatarakij, and S. Assabumrungrat, Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification with CO2 recycle for synthesis gas production. Applied Energy, 2014. 114: p. 10-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.