EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 250 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 250 (2018) 06003 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 250, 2018
The 12th International Civil Engineering Post Graduate Conference (SEPKA) – The 3rd International Symposium on Expertise of Engineering Design (ISEED) (SEPKA-ISEED 2018)
Article Number 06003
Number of page(s) 13
Section Environmental Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201825006003
Published online 11 December 2018
  1. J. Corn, J. Cumbee, B.A. Chandler, D.E. Stallknech, J.R. Fischer. Implication of feral swine expansion: expansion of feral swine in the United States and potential implication for domestic swine. In PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL MEETINGUNITED STATES ANIMAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION, 109, 295 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Massei, & P.V. Genov,. The environmental impact of wild boar. Galemys, 16 (especial), 135-145 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  3. N.W. Seward, K. C. VerCauteren, G.W. Witmer, R.M. Engeman, Feral swine impacts on agriculture and the environment. Sheep & Goat Research Journal, 12 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Engeman, C. Betsill, T. Ray, Making contact: Rooting out the potential for exposure of commercial production swine facilities to feral swine in North Carolina, EcoHealth, 8(1), 76-81, (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. E.W. Schupp, Quantity, quality and the effectiveness of seed dispersal by animals. In Frugivory and seed dispersal: ecological and evolutionary aspects, 15-29 (1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R.H. GilesJr, Wildlife management. Wildlife management, (1978) [Google Scholar]
  7. R. McLeod, Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia, 71 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Madden, Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: global perspectives on local efforts to address human–wildlife conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9(4), 247-257 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M.R. Conover, Resolving human-wildlife conflicts: the science of wildlife damage management, (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Ann Kili, Elderly couple mauled to death by wild boar. The Star Online Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/07/02/rubber-tappers-killed-by-wild-boar/ (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. Murali, R.S.N Close call with a wild boar. The Star Online. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2014/10/05/close-call-with-a-wild-boarelderly-wo man-survives-dawn-attack/ (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. E.S. Williams, I. K. Barker, (Eds.) Infectious diseases of wild mammals, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Hutton, T. DeLiberto, S. Owen, B. Morrison, Disease risks associated with increasing feral swine numbers and distribution in the United States. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Geisser, & H.U, Reyer. The influence of food and temperature on population density of wild boar Sus scrofa in the Thurgae (Switzerland). Journal of Zoology, 267(1), 89-96 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Schlageter., D. Haag-Wackernagel, A gustatory repellent for protection of agricultural land from wild boar damage: an investigation on effectiveness. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(5), 61 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Cellina, (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sussex) Effects of supplemental feeding on the body condition and reproductive state of wild boar Sus scrofa in Luxembourg 18, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Schlageter, Preventing wild boar” Sus scrofa” damage-considerations for wild boar management in highly fragmented agroecosystems (Doctoral dissertation, University of Basel). (2015). [Google Scholar]
  18. M.L.K. Murty, Cultural Ecology of the Eastern Ghats (South India) from Pre-historic Times to the Ethnographic Present. Peoples and Environment in India. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House, 51-78. (2001). [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Kittawornrat, & J.J. Zimmerman, Toward a better understanding of pig behavior and pig welfare. Animal Health Research Reviews, 12(01), 25-32. (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. O.L. Stephens, M.T. Mengak, G. Gallagher, & K.V. Miller, Using Milorganite® to repel white-tailed deer from ornamental plantings, Wildlife Management Publication Series (2005). [Google Scholar]
  21. J.D Scott, & T.W. Townsend, Methods used by selected Ohio growers to control damage by deer. 13(3), 234-240. (1985) [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Gupta, (2014). Human Hair “Waste” and Its Utilization: Gaps and Possibilities. Journal of Waste Management. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  23. M.K. Deka, M. Bhuyan, & L.K. Hazarika, Traditional pest management practices of Assam. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  24. V.V. Rao, B. Naresh, V.R. Reddy, C. Sudhakar, P. Venkateswarlu, D.R. Rao, Traditional management methods used to minimize wild boar (Sus scrofa) damage in different agricultural crops at Telangana state, India International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(2), 32-36. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Rozaq, & N. Sofriani. Organic pesticide from urine and spices modification. Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry, 2(Special Issue), (2009). [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Andersson, Turning waste into value: using human urine to enrich soils for sustainable food production in Uganda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 290-298. (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. K.K. Wagner., & D.L. Nolte, Comparison of active ingredients and delivery systems in deer repellents. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 322-330. (2001). [Google Scholar]
  28. Y.D. Cheng, X.P. Wang, Y.E. Qian, Y.X. Zhang, M.G Tan, Preparation and certification of the human hair reference material. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 3(4) (1992). [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Sen., & A.B. Das Chaudhuri, aBrief communication: choice of washing method of hair samples for trace element analysis in environmental studies. American journal of physical anthropology, 115(3), 289-291. (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Sen, Human hair in personal identification and documenting drug and substance abuse. Anthropologist, 12(1), 47-58.(2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. L. B. Hanson, J. B. Grand, M. S. Mitchell, D. B. Jolley, B.D. Sparklin, & S.S. Ditchkoff. Change-in-ratio density estimator for feral pigs is less biased than closed mark–recapture estimates. Wildlife Research, 35(7), 695-699. (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. T.A. Campbell, & D. B. Long. Species-specific visitation and removal of baits for delivery of pharmaceuticals to feral swine. Journal of wildlife diseases, 43(3), 485-491. (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.