EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 246 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 246 (2018) 01061 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 246, 2018
2018 International Symposium on Water System Operations (ISWSO 2018)
Article Number 01061
Number of page(s) 10
Section Main Session: Water System Operations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824601061
Published online 07 December 2018
  1. Z. Lei, H. Hu, and S. Yang. A review of soil water research. Advances in Water Science 10, 311-318(1999). [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Xiao and S. Wang. Comments on the progress and direction in soil water research. Ecology and Environmental Sciences 18(3), 1182-1188 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  3. J. L. Monteith. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society, London, B 281, 277-329(1977). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Robock, K. Y. Vinnikov, G. Srinivasan, J. K. Entin, S. E. Hollinger, N. A. Speranskaya, S. Liu, and A. Namkhai. The global soil moisture data bank. B. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81 (6),1281-1299(2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. K. A. McColl, S. H. Alemohammad, R. Akbar, A. G. Konings, S. Yueh, and D. Entekhabi. The global distribution and dynamics of surface soil moisture. Nat. Geosci. 10(2), 100-104(2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Sprenger, T. H. M. Volkmann, T. Blume, and M. Weiler. Estimating flow and transport parameters in the unsaturated zone with pore water stable isotopes. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19 (6),2617-2635(2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. D. Ankeny, M. Ahmed, T. C. Kaspar, and R. Horton. Simple field method determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 467-470(1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Tamari, L. Bruckler, J. Halbertsma, and J. Chadoeuf. A simple method for determining soil hydraulic properties in the laboratory. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57 (3),642-651(1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. R. Marshall, C. E. Ballard, Z. L. Frogbrook, I. Solloway, N. McIntyre, B. Reynolds, and H. S. Wheater. The impact of rural land management changes on soil hydraulic properties and runoff processes: results from experimental plots in upland UK. Hydrol. Process. 28(4), 2617-2629(2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Romano. Soil moisture at local scale: measurements and simulations. J. Hydrol. 516(6), 6-20(2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Fang, L. Sun, and Z. Tang. Effects of rainfall and slope on runoff, soil erosion and rill development: an experimental study using two loess soils. Hydrol. Process. 29(11), 2649-2658(2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Morbidelli, C. Saltalippi, A. Flammini, M. Cifrodelli, C. Corradini, and R. S. Govindaraju. Infiltration on sloping surfaces: Laboratory experimental evidence and implications for infiltration modeling. J. Hydrol. 523, 79-85(2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Peng, A. Loew, O. Merlin, and N. E. C. Verhoest. A review of spatial downscaling of satellite remotely sensed soil moisture. Rev. Geophys. 55, 341-366(2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Asgarzadeh, M. R. Mosaddeghi, A. R. Dexter, A. A. Mahboubi, and M. R. Neyshabouri. Determination of soil available water for plants: consistency between laboratory and field measurements. Geoderma s226-227(1), 8-20(2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Scholl, D. Leitner, G. Kammerer, W. Loiskandl, H. P. Kaul, and G. Bodner. Root induced changes of effective 1D hydraulic properties in a soil column. Plant and Soil 381, 193-213(2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Moghadas, A. Gustafsson, P. Viklander, J. Marsalek, and M. Viklander. Laboratory study of infiltration into two frozen engineered (sandy) soils recommended for bioretention. Hydrol. Process. 30(8), 1251-1264(2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. J. Coopersmith, M. H. Cosh, W. A. Petersen, J. Prueger, and J. J. Niemeier. Soil moisture model calibration and validation: an ARS watershed on the South Fork Iowa River. J. Hydrometeorol. 16(3), 1087–1101(2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Mohammadzadeh-Habili and M. Heidarpour. Application of the Green–Ampt model for infiltration into layered soils. J. Hydrol. 527, 824-832(2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. K. T. Zeleke, M. Anwar, and D. L. Liu. Managing crop stubble during fallow period for soil water conservation: field experiment and modelling. Environ. Earth Sci. 72(9), 3317-3327(2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Mao, Y. Zhu, L. Shi, Z. Liu, H. Dai, and J. Yang. Modified unsaturated water flow model selection method and application to field experiments. Advances in Water Science 27, 231-239(2016). [Google Scholar]
  21. X. Gao, C. Lu, Q. Luan, S. Zhang, J. Liu, and D. Han. Mapping Farmland-Soil Moisture at a Regional Scale Using a Distributed Hydrological Model: Case Study in the North China Plain. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 142(9), (2016). [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Lu, D. Qin, J. Zhang, and R. Wang. MODCYCLEan object oriented modularized hydrological model I, theory and development.” Journal of hydraulic engineering, 43, 1135-1145(2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Wang, C. Lu, Q. Sun, W. Xiao, G. Cao, H. Li, L. Yan, and B. Zhang. Simulating the hydrologic cycle in coal mining subsidence areas with a distributed hydrologic model. Sci. Rep., (2017). [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Martinec. The degree-day factor for snowmeltrunoff forecasting. IAHS-AISH Publications, 51, 468-477(1960). [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Venetis. A study on the recession of unconfined aquifers. Bulletin of the International Association of Scientific Hydrology, 14(4), 119-125(1969). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. E. C. Gilmore and R. S. Rogers. Heat units as a method of measuring maturity in corn. Agron. J., 50(10), 611-615 (1958). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.