EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 150 (2018) MATEC Web of Conferences, 150 (2018) 06027 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 150, 2018
Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017)
Article Number 06027
Number of page(s) 8
Section Information & Communication Technology (ICT), Science (SCI) & Mathematics (SM)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815006027
Published online 23 February 2018
  1. Cheng, C., Lai, M. & Wu, W. (2010), “Exploring the impact of innovation strategy on R&D employees’ job satisfaction: a mathematical model and empirical research”, Technovation, Vol. 30 Nos 7/8, pp. 459-70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2013). Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(4), 491-507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European journal of innovation management, 7(4), 303-313. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130-147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2012). A psychological taxonomy of organizational innovation: Resolving the paradoxes. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 29-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. DiBella, A. J., Nevis, E. C., & Gould, J. M. (1996). Understanding organizational learning capability. Journal of management studies, 33(3), 361-379. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Akgun, A.E., Ince, H., imamoglu, S.Z., Keskin, H. and Kocoglu, i. (2013), The mediator role of learning and business innovativeness between total quality management and financial performance. International Journal of Production Research, Vol.52, No. 3, 888-901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Camison, C., & Villar-Lopez, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tuksinnimit, N., Durongwatana, S., & Vadhanasindhu, P. (2015). The Factors Affecting Organizational Innovativeness. Journal of Management Research, 7(2), 561-573. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Slater, S.F., Mohr, J. J., & Sengupta, S. (2014). Radical product innovation capability: Literature review, synthesis, and illustrative research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 552-566. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Khalib, L. H., Kassim, N. A., Ghazali, F. I., Jaafar, N., & Idris, A. (2015). Organizational Learning Capabilities (OLC) toward Job Satisfaction: A Conceptual Framework. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1609-1621. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Onag, A. O., Tepeci, M., & Başalp, A. A. (2014). Organizational Learning Capability and its Impact on Firm Innovativeness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 708-717. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Menold, M. J., Jablokow, K., Purzer, S., Ferguson, D. M., & Ohland, M. W. (2014). A critical review of measures of innovativeness. age, 24, 1. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gunsel A., Siachou E. and Acar A. Z., (2011), Knowledge management and learning capability to enhance organizational innovativeness, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, pp.880-888. [Google Scholar]
  16. Argote, L. (2011). ‘Organizational learning research: past, present and future’, Management Learning, 42, pp. 439–446. Armstrong, J. S. and T. S. Overton (1977). ‘Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys’, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, pp. 396 – 402. [Google Scholar]
  17. Salim, I. M. and M. Sulaiman (2011). ‘Organizational learning, innovation and performance: a study of Malaysian small and medium sized enterprises’, International Journal of Business and Management, 6, pp. 118–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bess, K.D.,Perkins, D.D., & McCown, D.L. (2011), Testing a mesure of organizational learning capacity and readiness for transformational change in human services. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, Vol.39, pp.35-49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tohidi H., Seyedaliakbar S. M., Mandegari M.,(2012), Organizational learning measurement and the effect on firm innovation, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 25 Iss: 3 pp. 219 – 245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Campbell, C., Silver, I., Sherbino, J., Ten Cate, O. and Holmboe, E. (2010), “Competency-based continuing professional development”, Medical Teacher, Vol. 32 No. 8, pp. 657-62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Real, J. C., Roldan, J. L., & Leal, A. (2014). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 186-208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business. Hoboken. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nunnally, J. C. (1979). Citation classic-psychometric theory. Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, (22), 12-12. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2008). International Edition: Business Research Methods. [Google Scholar]
  26. Straub, D. W. (1989).Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS quarterly, 147-169. [Google Scholar]
  27. Damanpour, F.; Walker, R. M.; Combinative, C. N. A. 2009. Effects of innovation types and organizational performance: a longitudinal study of service organizations, Journal of Management Studies 46(4): 650–675. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.