EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 150 (2018) MATEC Web of Conferences, 150 (2018) 06003 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 150, 2018
Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017)
Article Number 06003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Information & Communication Technology (ICT), Science (SCI) & Mathematics (SM)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815006003
Published online 23 February 2018
  1. Yoo, Illhoi, Patricia Alafaireet, Miroslav Marinov, Keila Pena-Hernandez, Rajitha Gopidi, Jia-Fu Chang, and Lei Hua. “Data mining in healthcare and biomedicine: a survey of the literature.” Journal of medical systems 36, no. 4 (2012): 2431-2448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Witten, Ian H., Eibe Frank, Mark A. Hall, and Christopher J. Pal. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang, Chun-Lang, and Chih-Hao Chen.“Applying decision tree and neural network to increase quality of dermatologic diagnosis.” Expert Systems with Applications 36, no. 2 (2009): 4035-4041. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. U. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, and P. Smyth,“From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases,” AI Mag., vol. 17, no. 3, p. 37, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Chauhan and V. Jaiswal, “An efficient data mining classification approach for detecting lung cancer disease,” in Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), International Conference on, 2016, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Cottle, W. Hoover, S. Kanwal, M. Kohn, T. Strome, and N. Treister, “Transforming Health Care Through Big Data Strategies for leveraging big data in the health care industry,” Inst. Heal. Technol. Transform. http//ihealthtran. com/big-data-in-healthcare, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ramana, Bendi Venkata, M. Surendra Prasad Babu, and N. B. Venkateswarlu. “A critical study of selected classification algorithms for liver disease diagnosis.” International Journal of Database Management Systems 3, no. 2 (2011): 101-114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sharmila, K., and S. A. Vethamanickam. “Survey on data mining algorithm and its application in healthcare sector using Hadoop platform.”International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 5, no. 1 (2015): 567-71. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kharya, Shweta. “Using data mining techniques for diagnosis and prognosis of cancer disease.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.1923 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. Dangare, Chaitrali S., and Sulabha S. Apte. “A data mining approach for prediction of heart disease using neural networks.” (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. Shim, Jeong-Yon, and Lei Xu. ”Medical data mining model for oriental medicine via BYY binary independent factor analysis.” In Circuits and Systems, 2003. ISCAS’03. Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on, vol. 5, pp. V-V. IEEE, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ghofrani, Fatemeh, Mohammad Sadegh Helfroush, Habibollah Danyali, and Kamran Kazemi. “Improving the performance of machine learning algorithms using fuzzy-based features for medical x-ray image classification.” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 27, no. 6 (2014): 3169-3180. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. A. Lashari, R. Ibrahim, N. Senan, I. T. R. Yanto, and T. Herawan, “Application of Wavelet De-noising Filters in Mammogram Images Classification Using Fuzzy Soft Set,” in International Conference on Soft Computing and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 529-537. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. A. Lashari, R. Ibrahim, and N. Senan, “De-noising analysis of mammogram images in the wavelet domain using hard and soft thresholding,” in Information and Communication Technologies (WICT), 2014 Fourth World Congress on, 2014, pp. 353-357. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Khanmohammadi, Sina, and Chun-An Chou. “A Gaussian mixture model based discretization algorithm for associative classification of medical data.” Expert Systems with Applications 58 (2016): 119-129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xing, Yanwei, Jie Wang, and Zhihong Zhao. “Combination data mining methods with new medical data to predicting outcome of coronary heart disease.” In Convergence Information Technology, 2007. International Conference on, pp. 868-872. IEEE, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rajini, N. Hema, and R. Bhavani.“Classification of MRI brain images using k-nearest neighbor and artificial neural network.” In Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT), 2011 International Conference on, pp. 563-568. IEEE, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  18. Polat, Kemal, Seral Şahan, Halife Kodaz, and Salih Güneş. “Breast cancer and liver disorders classification using artificial immune recognition system (AIRS) with performance evaluation by fuzzy resource allocation mechanism.” Expert Systems with Applications 32, no. 1 (2007): 172-183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Aswal, Shobha, and Neelu Jyothi Ahuja. “Experimental analysis of traditional classification algorithms on bio medical dtatasets.” In Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT), 2016 2nd International Conference on, pp. 566-568. IEEE, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tang, Ping-Hung, and Ming-Hseng Tseng. “Medical data mining using BGA and RGA for weighting of features in fuzzy k-NN classification.” In Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2009 International Conference on, vol. 5, pp. 3070-3075. IEEE, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Long, Nguyen Cong, Phayung Meesad, and Herwig Unger. “A highly accurate firefly based algorithm for heart disease prediction.” Expert Systems with Applications 42, no. 21 (2015): 8221-8231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zuo, Wan-Li, Zhi-Yan Wang, Tong Liu, and Hui-Ling Chen. “Effective detection of Parkinson’s disease using an adaptive fuzzy k-nearest neighbor approach.” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 8, no. 4 (2013): 364-373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.