Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 150, 2018
Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017)
Article Number 05049
Number of page(s) 5
Section Education, Social Science & Technology Management
Published online 23 February 2018
  1. G. Salmon, E-moderating:The Key to Teaching & Learning Online . London, New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Kambourakis, D.P. Kontoni, and I. Sapounas, Introducing Attribute Certificates to Secure Distributed E-Learning or M-Learning Services. Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference, (pp. 436-440). Innsbruck, Australia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Wentzel, R.V. Lammeron, M. Molendijk, S. Bruin, and A. Wagtendonk, Using Mobile Technology to Enhance Students' Educational Experiences, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Sharples, J. Taylor, and G. Vavoula, Retrieved from of Mobile.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Chan, J. Roschelle, S. Hsi, Kinshuk, M. Sharple, T. Brown, T, One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1 (1), 3-29. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Mislina, A.C. Koo., and B.H. Madhubala, (2010). Mobile Learning: Will this innovation provide better support to Malaysian tertiary level students?. International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. Madrid, Spain. [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Ernest (2009). “The Mathematics Attitudes, Beliefs and Ability of Students”, University of Exeter [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Soloway and C. Norris (2012). “Devices are ready-at-hand”, Communications of the ACM 44(6), 15-20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Maniar, (2008). The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software. 3(4), 51-61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Seppala and H. Alamaki, (2003). Mobile learning in teacher training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 19, 330-335. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Polishook, (2005). Handheld composing: Reconceptualizing artistic practice with PDAs. [Google Scholar]
  12. W. Daher and N. Bayaa' (2009). Learning Mathematics in an authentic mobile environment: The perceptions of students. iJim (3), 6-14. [Google Scholar]
  13. A.C.Ganger and M. Jackson, (2003). Wireless handheld computers in the preclinical undergraduate curiculum. Medical Education Online, 8(3). [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Fujimura and M. Doi, (2006). Collecting students' degree of comprehension with mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual EPL, 84 2008 ACM SIGUCCS Conference on Users Services (pp. 123-127). Edmonton, Alberta: Canada. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Corlett, M. Sharples, S. Bull and T. Chan, (2005). Evaluation of a mobile learning organizer for university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 162-170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Olney and G. Lefoe, (2007). Introducing mobile technologies: Preparatory staff development issues. In ICT:Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Atkinson, S. Derry, A. Renkl, and D. Wortham, (2000). Learning from examples:instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181-214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Franklin and J. Garfield, (2006), The guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) project: Developing statistics education guidelines for Pre K-12 and college courses. In G. F. Burrill, (Ed.), Thinking and Reasoning about Data and Chance: Sixty-eighth NCTM Yearbook (pp. 345-375). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Sharifah Nadiyah, S. Faaizah, H. Hanipah, and B. Norasiken, (2015). Online collaborative learning elements to propose an online project based collaborative learning model. Jurnal Teknologi, pp 55-60. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Mislina, A.C. Koo, and B.H. Madhubala, (2009). Factor Analysis on the students' attitude towards Probability. Simposium Kebangsaan Sains Matematik ke 17. 2, pp. 622-627. Melaka: Universiti Putra Malaysia. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.