Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 147, 2018
The Third International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure and Built Environment (SIBE 2017)
Article Number 07005
Number of page(s) 6
Section Geothechnical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814707005
Published online 22 January 2018
  1. An, Min et al, A Fuzzy Reasoning anf Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Process Based Approach to the Process of Railway Risk Information: A Railway Risk Management System, Information Sciences 181, pp. 3946-3966 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Attaway, Stormy, MATLAB: A Practical Introduction to Programming and Problem Solving, Oxford - UK: Bitterworth - Heinermann - Elsevier Inc. (2009) [Google Scholar]
  3. Andric, Jelena M. et al, Risk Assessment of Bridges Under Multiple Hazards in Operation Period, Journal of Safety Science - Elsevier 83, pp. 80-92 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carbonari, Sandro et al, Soil-Structure Interaction Effect in Single Bridge Piers Founded on Inclined Pile Groups, Soil Dynamics and Earquake Engineering 92, pp. 52-67 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook, Wesley et al, Bridge Failure Rate, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facility 29, pp. 1-8 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. Corotis, Ross B., An Overview of Uncertainty Concepts Related to Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering System Vol. 1, pp. 1-12 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  7. Craig, Robert F., Soil Mechanics, 7th edition, New York - USA: Spon Press (2004) [Google Scholar]
  8. Duncan J.M. and Stephen G. Wright, Soil Strength and Slope Stability, New Jersey - USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc. (2005) [Google Scholar]
  9. Fagundes, Diego F. et al, Load Transfer Mechanism and Deformation of Reinforced Piled Embankment, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 45, pp. 1-10 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kusumadewi, Sri et al, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM), Yogyakarta - Indonesia: Penerbit Graha Ilmu (2006) [Google Scholar]
  11. Kusumadewi, Sri, Analisis & Desain Sistem Fuzzy Menggunakan Toolbox Matlab, Yogyakarta - Indonesia: Penerbit Graha Ilmu (2002) [Google Scholar]
  12. Kusumadewi, Sri, Aplikasi Logika Fuzzy Untuk Pendukung Keputusan, 2nd edition, Yogyakarta - Indonesia: Penerbit Graha Ilmu (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee, Sangwook, Determination of Priority Weight Under Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Situation: AHP versus Fuzzy AHP, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 141, pp. 1-9 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. Marwoto, Sofa, Pemodelan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Pemeliharaan Jembatan Beton, Jurnal Teknik Sipil, Volume II No 1 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. Maula B.H. and Zhang, L., Assessment of Embankment Factor of Safety Using Two Commercially Available Programs in Slope Stability Analysis, Procedia Engineering 14, pp. 559-566 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nezarat, Hamidreza et al, Ranking of Geological Risks in Mechanized Tunneling by Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP), Tunneling and Underground Space Technology 50, pp. 358-364 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Patel D.A. et al, Hazard Assessment Using Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relation Approach, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 142, pp. 1-10 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Senouci, Ahmed et al, Fuzzy-Based Model for Predicting Failure of Oil Pipelines, Journal of Infrastructure System 20, pp. 1-11 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zadeh, Lotfi A., Is There a Need for Fuzzy Logic, Journal of Information Sciences No 178, pp. 2751-2779 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zatar W.A. et al, Bridge Embankment. I: Seismic Risk Assessment and Rating, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facility 22, pp. 171-180 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.