Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 147, 2018
The Third International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure and Built Environment (SIBE 2017)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Water and Waste Engineering and Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814704001
Published online 22 January 2018
  1. Strande, L, The Global Situation, Faecal Sludge Management, L. Strande, M. Ronteltap, & D. Brdjanovic,, London: IWA Publishing, 1-14, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anggraini, F., Nuraeni, R., Yudiarti, I., Rosa, Y., Prayudi, T. R., Effendi, R. R., Pamekas, R., Audit Teknologi Sistem Instalasi Pengolahan Lumpur Tinja (IPLT), Bandung: PT. Kiblat Buku Utama, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anggraini, F., & Nuraeni, R., Diagnosis Kinerja Instalasi Pengolahan Lumpur Tinja (IPLT), Widyariset, Vol. 1 No. 1 Hal. 87-99, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pusat Audit Teknologi, Framework, Kode Etik dan Standar, Pedoman Umum Audit Teknologi, Jakarta: Pusat Audit Teknologi – BPPT, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  5. Toloui, A., & Matin, Y. A., Measuring Technological Level and Capability of the Industries in East Azerbaijan and Providing Prover Strategies for Improvement and Promotion of Technology, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (4) 3664-3669, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zaker, A. R., Tajik, H., & Bahramifaraz, F., Analyzing the Effect of Management of Technology Transfer in Science and Technology Parks for Wealth Creation, Case Study: Science and Technology Park of Tehran University, International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Science, Vol. 4 (10): 3427-3433, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  7. Padmowati, R. d., Analisis Teknik Indeks Konsistensi harmonik pada metode Analytical Hierarchy Process, Bandung: LPPM-Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Febrinata, Perancangnan Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Menggunakan Metode Balance Scorecard dan Pairwise Comparison di PT. Aston System Indonesia, Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  9. Samad, M. A., Hussain, M. R., & Asrafuzzaman, M., Analysis of Performace by Overall Equipment Effectiveness of the CNC Cutting Section of a Shipyard, ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 2 No. 11 pp. 1091-1096, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zandieh, S.,Tabatabael, S. A., & Ghandehary, M., Evaluation of Overall Equipment Effectiveness in Continuous Process Production System of Condensate Stabilization Plant in Assalooyeh, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Vol. 3 No. 10 pp. 590-598, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Boban, B., & Joseph E., J., Enchancing Overall Equipment Effectiveness for a Manufacturing Firm through Total Productive Maintenance, Enchancing Overall Equipment Effectiveness for a Manufacturing Firm through Total Productive Maintenance, Vol. 3 Issue. 8 pp 425-429, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nayak, D., Kumar M N, V., Naidu, G., & Shankar, V., Evaluation of OEE in a Continuous Process Industry on an Insulation Line in a Cable Manufacturing Unit, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 2. Issue. 5 pp. 1629-1634, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rahmad, Pratikto, & Wahyudi, S., Penerapan Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) dalam Implementasi Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) (Studi Kasus di Pabrik Gula PT. "Y"), Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin, Vol. 3 No. 3 Hal. 431-437, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dinas Kebersihan dan Pertamanan Kab. Indramayu, Standar Operasional dan Prosedur IPLT Pecuk Kabupaten Indramayu, Indramayu: Dinas Kebersihan dan Pertamanan Kabupaten Indramayu, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Putra, R. R., Analisis Faktor Penentu Pengembangan Sistem Pengolahan Air Limbah Terpusat Kota Tangerang (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Tangerang), Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.