Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 135, 2017
8th International Conference on Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering 2017 (ICME’17)
Article Number 00030
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 20 November 2017
  1. Grotle, M, Brox JI, Vøllestad NK. Functional status and disability questionnaires: What do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine, 30, 130–140 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  2. Deyo RA. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69,1044-1053 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  3. Rahman, M.N.A. Aziz, F.A. and Yusuff, R.M: Survey of body part symptoms among workers in a car tyre service centre. Journal of Human Ergology, 39 (1), 53-56 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  4. Rahman, M.N.A. M.R.A. Rani, and M.J. Rohani: Investigation of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in wall plastering jobs within the construction industry. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 43 (4), 507-514 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. Rahman, M.N.A. Zakaria, N. H. Masood, I. Adzila, S. & Nasir, N. F: Risk assessment for assessing the subjective occupant seating discomfort related office works. Information, 19 (7B), 3025-3030 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. Lynn, M.R. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs. Res. 35 (6) 382-385 (1986) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Streiner, D.L. Norman, G.R. Health Measurement Scales: a Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, second ed. Oxford University Press, New York (1995) [Google Scholar]
  8. Turner, R. Quittner, A.L. Parasuraman, B.M. Kallich, J.D. Cleeland, C.S. Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group, Patient-reported Outcomes: Instrument Development and Selection Issues, Value Health 10(Suppl. 2) 86-93 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Snyder, C.F. Watson, M.E. Jackson, J.D. Cella, D. Halyard, M.Y. Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group. Patient-reported Outcome Instrument Selection: Designing a Measurement Strategy. Value Health 10(Suppl. 2), 76-85 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tilden, V.P. Nelson, C.A. May, B.A. Use of qualitative methods to enhance content validity. Nurs. Res. 39 (3), 172-175 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  11. Intermediate Care National Evaluation Team. A national evaluation of the costs and outcomes of intermediate care for older people. Final report. University of Leciester, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  12. Leal, Rossana B. et al. Development of a questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life among children and adolescents with mouth breathing American journal of rhinology 7 allergy 29 (6) 212-215 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Saab, Sammy et al. Development of a disease-specific questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in liver transplant recipients Liver Transplantation 17 (5) 567-579 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairbank, J, Couper J, Davies J et al. The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66, 271-273 (1980) [Google Scholar]
  15. Million, R, Hall W, Nilsen KH, Baker RD, Jayson MI. Assessment of the progress of the back -pain patient- Volvo Award in Clinical Science. Spine 7, 204-212 (1981) [Google Scholar]
  16. Roland, M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of low back pain- Part 1. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back-pain-. Spine 30, 130-140 (1983) [Google Scholar]
  17. Waddell, G, Main CJ. Assessment of severity in low-back disorders. Spine 9, 204-208 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  18. Greenough CG, Fraser RD. Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine 17, 36-41 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  19. Manniche, C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, Vinterberg H, Kreiner S, Jordan A. Low Back Pain Rating scale- validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain-. Elsevier Science 57 (3), 317-326 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  20. Ruta DA, Garrant AM, Wardlaw D et al. Developing a valid and reliable measure of health outcome for patients with low back pain. Spine 19, 1887-1896 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  21. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M et al. The Quebec back pain disability scale-measurement properties-. Spine 20, 341-352 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  22. Daltroy LH, Cats Baril WL, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Liang MH. The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine 21, 741-749 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  23. Halpern, N, Hiebert R, Nordin M, Crane M. The test – retest reliability of a new occupational risk factor questionnaire for outcome studies. Applied Ergonomics, 32(1), 39-46 (2001) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hudson-Cook N, Tomes-Nicholson K, Breen A A revised Oswestry disability questionnaire. In Roland M, Jenner JR (eds) Back Pain: New Approaches to Rehabilitation and Education. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 187–204 (1989) [Google Scholar]
  25. Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A Comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the Quebec back pain disability scale. Phys Ther, 81, 776–788 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, van den Ancker M, Singer DE, Keller RB, Patrick DL. The Maine-Seattle Back Questionnaire: a 12-item disability questionnaire for evaluating patients with lumbar sciatica or stenosis. Results of a derivation and validation cohort analysis. Spine 28, 1869–1876 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  27. Bergner, Marilyn et al. The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure International Journal of Health Services 6 (3), 393-415 (1976) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ et al. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine 20, 1899–1909 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  29. Stratford PW, Binkley JM Measurement properties of the RM-18: a modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Scale. Spine, 22, 2416–2421 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuorinka, I. Jonsson, B. Kilbom, A. Vinterberg, H.. Biering-Sorensen, F. Andersson, G. and Jorgensen, K. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl. Ergonom., 18, 233-237 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  31. Evans, James H and I. I Abbott Kagan. The development of a functional rating scale to measure the treatment outcome of chronic spinal patients Spine 11 (3) 277-281 (1986) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.