Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 135, 2017
8th International Conference on Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering 2017 (ICME’17)
Article Number 00023
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 20 November 2017
  1. US Department of Labor. (2000). Ergonomics : The Study of Work. OSHA 3125, 2000. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  2. OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Act. (2004). Guidelines for Retail Grocery Stores : Ergonomics for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders. OSHA, (1), 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Shinnar, J. Indelicato, M. Altimari, and S. Shinnar. (2004). Survey of ergonomic features of supermarket cash registers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 34(6), 535–541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J.K. Park and, S.H. Jang. (2010). Association between Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Psychosocial Factors at Work: A Review on the Job DCS Model’s Perspective. Safety and Health at Work, 1(1), 37–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M.N.A. Rahman and, N.S.A. Razak. Review on Pen and Paper Based Observational Methods for Assessing Work-related Upper Limb Disorders. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9, 1-11 (Special Issue) (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Forcier, C. Lapointe, M. Lortie, P. Buckle, I. Kuorinka, J. Lemaire, et al. (2008). Supermarket workers: their work and their health, particularly their self-reported musculoskeletal problems and compensable injuries. Work (Reading, Mass), 30(4), 493–510. [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Roman-liu, J. Bugajska, and T. Tokarski. (2014). Comparative Study of Upper Limb Load Assessment and Occurrence of Musculoskeletal Disorders at Repetitive Task Workstations. Industrial Health, 52, 461–470. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. K.R., Lehman., J.P. Psihogios., and, R.G. Meulenbroek. (2001). Effects of sitting versus standing and scanner type on cashiers. Ergonomics, 44(7), 719–738. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Dul, B. Weerdmeester. (2008). Ergonomics for Beginners: A Quick Reference Guide. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. M.N.A. Rahman, F.A. Aziz, and R.M. Yusuff. (2010). Survey of body part symptoms among workers in a car tyre service centre. Journal of Human Ergology, 39(1), 53–56. [Google Scholar]
  11. M.N.A. Rahman, H.R. Haq, M.F. Hassan, M. A. Arifin, M. Z. Yunos, S. A. Bakar. et al. Musculoskeletal discomfort among workers in mould manufacturing industry. ARPJ Journal of Ergineering and Applied Sciences, 10(15), 6269-6273 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  12. M, N.A. Rahman, M.R.A. Rani and M. J. Rohani. (2012). Investigation of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in wall plastering jobs within construction industry. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 43 (4), 507-514. [Google Scholar]
  13. P.L. Hudak, P.C. Amadio, and C. Bombardier. (1996). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29(6), 602–608. [Google Scholar]
  14. HSE. Health & Safety Executive. (2010). Assessment of Repetitive Tasks of the upper limbs (ART tool), 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  15. J.S. Moore and, A. Garg. (1995) ‘The strain index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders’, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 56 (5), 443-458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Occhipinti and, D. Colombini. (1996). Alterazioni muscolo-scheletriche degli arti superiori da sovraccarico biomeccanico: metodi e criteri per l’inquadrament o dell’esposizione lavorativa. La Medicina del Lavoro, 87(6), 491-525. [Google Scholar]
  17. S.C. Monnington., A.D. Pinder and, C. Quarrie. (2002). Development of an inspection tool for manual handling risk assessment. (Sheffield, Health and Safety Laboratory), HSL. Internal Report ERG/02/20. [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Drinkaus, D.S. Bloswick., R. Sesek, C. Mann, and T. Bernard. (2005). Job level risk assessment using task level strain index scores: a pilot study. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics : JOSE, 11(2), 141–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.