Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 120, 2017
International Conference on Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials & Civil Engineering Systems (ASCMCES-17)
Article Number 08006
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Solutions for Buildings, Constructions and Infrastructures
Published online 09 August 2017
  1. Gaewski, P., Tata and Howard, Inc., and Blaha, F., AwwaRF, Analysis of Total Cost of Large Diameter Pipe Failures (2007). [Google Scholar]
  2. Jones, C.. Paper presented at the Life Extension of Technologies Workshop, New York, Incentives and Barriers to the use of Trenchless Technology (1999) [Google Scholar]
  3. Allouche, E., Ariaratnam, S., and AbouRizk, S. Construction Congress VI: ASCE, VA. 543–553, Multi-Dimensional Utility Model for Selection of a Trenchless Construction Method (2000). [Google Scholar]
  4. Gilchrist, A., and Allouche, E. N.. Tunnelling and underground space technology, 201, 89–104, Quantification of social costs associated with construction projects: state-of-the-art review (2005). [Google Scholar]
  5. Manuilova, A., Dormuth, D., and Vanier, D. National Research Center, Canada, MIIP Report: A Case Study of Use and External Components of Social Costs that are related to Municipal Infrastructure Rehabilitation, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  6. Rahman, S., Vanier, D.J., and Newton, L. A. National Research Center, Canada, MIIP Report: Social Cost Considerations for Municipal Infrastructure Management. (2005) [Google Scholar]
  7. Martin, T., Johnson, D., and Anschell, S. Proceeding, Leading Edge Conference on Strategic Asset Management, IWA, Lisbon, Portugal, Using historical repair data to create customized predictive failure curves for sewer pipe risk modeling.(2007). [Google Scholar]
  8. Torterotot, J. P., Sousa e Silva, D., Barbier, R., Werey, C., Pereira A., Konig, A., Montginoul, M., and Waechter V. IWA Publishing, CARE-S Computer Aided Rehabilitation of Sewer and Storm Water Networks.73–88, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  9. Cromwell, J. E., and Pearson, N. AWWARF, Denver, Cost of infrastructure failure. (2002). [Google Scholar]
  10. Salman, B. and Salem, O. Journal of pipeline systems engineering and practice, Risk Assessment of Wastewater Collection Lines Using Failure Models and Criticality Ratings., 3, 68–76. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  11. Ana, E. V., Ph.D. dissertation, University of Brussels, Belgium. Sewer asset management - sewer structural deterioration modelling and multi-criteria decision making in sewer rehabilitation projects prioritization (2009). [Google Scholar]
  12. Higgins, A.M. and Harris, A.H. Critical Care Clinics, Health economic methods: cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-benefit evaluations, 281, 11–24.(2012) [Google Scholar]
  13. Polinder, S., Toet, H., Panneman, M. and Beeck, E. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Denmark, Methodological Approaches for Cost-effectiveness and Cost-utility Analysis of Injury Prevention Measures, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  14. Moayyedi, P. and Mason, J., European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses: how did we get here and where are we going?, 16-6, 527–534 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  15. Adey, B.T. and Hajdin, R. Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. Methodology for determination of financial needs of gradually deteriorating bridges with only structure level data, 7 -8, 645–660 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vacheyroux, G. and Corotis, R., Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering Strategies of investment in the management of urban bridges: a life-cycle approach illustrated for Paris,, 9-11, 1080–1093 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  17. Marinoni, O., Adkins, P. and Hajkowicz, S. Journal of Environmental Modelling and Software, Water planning in a changing climate: join application of cost utility analysis and modern portfolio theory, 26 -1, 18–29 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  18. Hajkowicz, S., Spencer, R., Higgins, A. and Marinoni, O., Journal of Environmental Management, Evaluating water quality investments using cost utility analysis,, 884, 1601–1610, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  19. North American Electric Reliability Corporation, Standard CIP-002-1, Cyber Security, Critical Asset Identification. Washington, DC (2006). [Google Scholar]
  20. European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the Council on the Identification and Designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the Assessment of the Need to Improve Their Protection, COM2006787 Final, Brussels, Belgium (2006). [Google Scholar]
  21. Khogali, W. E., and Mohamed, E. H. Managing utility cuts: Issues and considerations. Paper presented at the NCRR/CPWA Seminar Series: Innovations in Urban Infrastructure. APWA International Public Works Congress NRCC/CPWA Seminar Series Innovations in Urban Infrastructure, 1–11, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  22. Gourvil, L. and Joubert, F. Évaluation de la congestion routièredans la région de Montréal: Québec: Transports Québec, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  23. Boyce, G., and Bried, E., Proceedings of North American No-Dig, Benefit–cost analysis of micro-tunneling in an urban area. 94,36–01 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  24. Pucker, J., Allouche, E., and Sterling, R. Proceeding of NASTT No-Dig Conference, Social Costs Associated with Trenchless Projects: Case Histories in North American and Europe. C4–04 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, A., Boardman, A. E., Gillen, D., and Waters, I., Report for Transport Canada Towards estimating the social and environmental costs of transportation in Canada. (2004) [Google Scholar]
  26. Gulliver, J., Springer-Verlag New York, 10.1007/978-1-4614-5731-2, Transport and Fate of Chemicals in the Environment: Selected Entries from the Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology (2012). [Google Scholar]
  27. Rail, D., Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., Lancaster, PA. Groundwater Contamination: Sources, Control, and Preventative Measures. 37–40, (1989) [Google Scholar]
  28. World Bank, Urban Development Sector Unit, Vietnam Country Department of the World Bank, Project appraisal document on a proposed loan to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam for the Ho Chi Minh City environmental sanitation project, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  29., accessed 15 November 2016 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.