Open Access

This article has an erratum: []

MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 120, 2017
International Conference on Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials & Civil Engineering Systems (ASCMCES-17)
Article Number 05006
Number of page(s) 15
Section Water and Environment
Published online 09 August 2017
  1. Sugawara, (1961): An analysis of runoff structure about several Japanese rivers”, J. of Geophys., JSCE, 2 (1961). [Google Scholar]
  2. Sugawara M: Automatic calibration of the tank model. Hydrological Sciences, 24(3), pp375–388 (1979). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sugawara M: Runoff analysis, Kyoritsu Edition (1974). [Google Scholar]
  4. Prasad R: A non-linear hydrologic system response model, J. of the Hydr. Div., ASCE, 4, pp. 201–221, (1967). [Google Scholar]
  5. Jermar M.K: Water resources and water management, Development in water science, 28,pp. 33–40, (1987). [Google Scholar]
  6. Athans M., Wishner R.P. and Bertolini A.: Suboptimal state estimation for continuous-time nonlinear systems from discrete noisy measurement, IEEE Transaction on automatic control, 13(5), (1968). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Balakrishnan N., and Joshi P.CProduct moments of order statitistics from doubly truncated exponential distribution, Naval research Logistics Quarterly, 31, pp 27–31. (1984). . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kitanidis P.K., and Bras R.L.,: Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model, 1.Analysis of uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 16(6), pp. 1025–1033(1980). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Anderson M.G., and Brut T.P. Hydrological forecasting, Wiley-Interscience Pub., (1985). [Google Scholar]
  10. Bras R.L., and Rodrigueze-Iturbe I.,Random Functions and Hydrology, Addison-Wesley Pub (1985). [Google Scholar]
  11. Merabtene T., Jinno K., Kawamura A., and Matsunaga T., Interactive user interface for rainfall-runoff analysis by tank model, Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, 57(3), pp. 107–120 (1997a). [Google Scholar]
  12. Merabtene T., Jinno K., and Kawamura A.,: Decision support system for the water resources management, Proc. of the 5th Symposium on Water Resources of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo, pp. 461–466 (1997b). [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Perrin, C. Michel, V. Andréassian: Modèles hydrologiques du Génie rural, Cemagref, pp3–16 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. Benkaci Ali Tarik: Modélisation pluie-débit mensuelle et journalière par les modèles conceptuels et les systèmes neuro-flous (Application aux bassins algériens), thèse de doctorat, pp 1–207, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  15. Ludovic Oudin: Recherche d’un modèle d’evapotranspiration potentielle pertinent comme entrée d’un modèle pluie-débit global, Mémoire de doctorat de l’Ecole Nationale du Génie rural, des eaux et forêts, Centre de : Paris, pp 1–495(2004). [Google Scholar]
  16. Nash J.E.& SutcliffeJ.V: Riverflow forecasting through conceptual model, J.Hydrol 10,pp. 282–290.(1970). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Krause P., Boyle D.P.2, and Base F.:Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment, Advances in Géosciences,5, pp. 89–97(2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.