Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 120, 2017
International Conference on Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials & Civil Engineering Systems (ASCMCES-17)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02015 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Sustainable Concrete Technology | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712002015 | |
| Published online | 09 August 2017 | |
- Fang, C., and Marle, F. Dealing with project complexity by matrix-based propagation modelling for project risk analysis.Journal of Engineering Design, 24(4), 239–256. (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Antoniadis, D., Edum-Fotwe, F., Thorpe, A., and McCaffer, R. Exploring Complexity in Construction Projects.1–6. (2008). [Google Scholar]
- Azhar, S., Hein, M., and Sketo, B. “Building Information Modeling (BIM): Benefits, Risks and Challenges.” Aurburn. (2008). [Google Scholar]
- Arayici, Y., Coates, P., Koskela, L., Kagioglou, M., Usher, C., and O’Reilly, K. “BIM adoption and implementation for architectural practices.” Structural Survey (2013). [Google Scholar]
- Love, P. E. D., Edwards, D. J., and Han, S. “Bad apple theory of human error and building information modelling: A systemic model for BIM implementation.” 349–354(2011a). [Google Scholar]
- Mehran D., Exploring the Adoption of BIM in the UAE construction industry for AEC firms. Procedia Engineering 145110-1118. (2016). [Google Scholar]
- Alabdulqader, A., Panuwatwanich, K., and Doh, J.-H. “Current use of building information modelling within Australian AEC industry.” The Thirteenth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC-13), C-3-1. (2013). [Google Scholar]
- Wong, A. K. D., Wong, F. K. W., and Nadeem, A. “Attributes of Building Information Modelling Implementations in Various Countries.” Architectural Engineering & Design Management, 6(4), 288–302(2010a). [Google Scholar]
- Cao, D., Li, H., and Wang, G. “Impacts of Isomorphic Pressures on BIM Adoption in Construction Projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(12), 04014056(2014). [Google Scholar]
- Lu, W., Peng, Y., Shen, Q., and Li, H. “Generic Model for Measuring Benefits of BIM as a Learning Tool in Construction Tasks.” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 139(2), 195–203(2013a). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Giel, B., and Issa, R. “Return on Investment Analysis of Building Information Modeling in Construction.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 27(5), 511–521. (2013). [Google Scholar]
- Crotty, R. The impact of building information modelling: transforming construction. Routledge. (2012). [Google Scholar]
- NBS. National BIM Report 2014. RIBA Enterprises Ltd (2014). [Google Scholar]
- Rekola, M., Kojima, J., and Mäkeläinen, T. “Towards Integrated Design and Delivery Solutions: Pinpointed Challenges of Process Change.” Architectural Engineering & Design Management, 6(S1), 264–278(2010a). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Smith, P. “BIM implementation - Global strategies.” 482–492(2014). [Google Scholar]
- Davies, R., and Harty, C. “Implementing ‘Site BIM’: A case study of ICT innovation on a large hospital project.” Automation in Construction, 30(0), 15–24(2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Porwal, A., and Hewage, K. N. “Building Information Modeling (BIM) partnering framework for public construction projects.” Automation in Construction, 31, 204–214(2013a). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jung, Y., and Joo, M. “Building information modelling (BIM) framework for practical implementation.” Automation in Construction, 20(2), 126–133(2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson, L., Amoako-Attah, J., and B-Jahromi, A. “Government’s influence on the implementation of BIM.” 520–527(2014). [Google Scholar]
- Shou, W., Wang, J., Wang, X., and Chong, H. Y. “A Comparative Review of Building Information Modelling Implementation in Building and Infrastructure Industries.” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 22(2), 291–308(2015). [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y., Zeng, N.-S., and Xu, B. “Research on the concept and framework of building information modeling ecosystem.” 1799–1805. (2014) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.