EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 120 (2017) MATEC Web Conf., 120 (2017) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 120, 2017
International Conference on Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials & Civil Engineering Systems (ASCMCES-17)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Structural Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712001002
Published online 09 August 2017
  1. Albanesi, T., Nuti, C. and Vanzi, I. (2000), “A simplified procedure to assess the seismic response of nonlinear structures”, Earthq. Spectra, 16(4), 715–734. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benazouz, C., Moussa, L. and Ali, Z, (2012), “Ductility and inelastic deformation demands of structures”, J. Struct. Eng. Mech, 42(5), 631–644. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. CEN (2005) Eurocode 8 — design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European standard EN 1998-3. June 2005. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels [Google Scholar]
  4. CGS (2003), Algerian seismic building code, National Center of Applied Research in Earthquake Engineering CGS, Algiers. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chikh B, Mehani Y and Leblouba M. (2016). Simplified procedure for seismic demands assessment of structures. Structural Engineering and Mechanics. 59(3):455–473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2001), A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure to Estimate Seismic Demands for Buildings: Theory and Preliminary Evaluation, PEER, Berkely, California, 2001/03. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chopra, A.K. and Chatpan, C. (2003), Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems. EERC, Berkely, California, 2003/09. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chopra, A.K. and Chatpan, C. (2004), “Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems”, J. Struct. Eng, 130(9), 1309–1319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chopra, A.K. (2007), Dynamics of Structures - Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, (3rd Edition), Prentice Hall, New Jersey. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1988), “N2 a method for nonlinear seismic analysis of regular structures” Proceedings of 9th World Conf on Earth Eng, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 5:111–116. [Google Scholar]
  11. Freeman, S.A., Nicoletti, J.P. and Tyrell, J.V. (1975), “Evaluation of existing buildings for seismic risk-a case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard”, Proceedings of 1st U S National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Berkeley, USA, pp 113–122. [Google Scholar]
  12. Iwan W D (1980) Estimating inelastic spectra from elastic spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 8(4):375–388. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gülkan, P. and Sözen, M. (1974), “Inelastic response of reinforced concrete structures to earthquake motions”. ACI J Proceedings. 71(12), 604–610. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K. (2000), “Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures”, Earthq. Spectra, 16(2), 367–392. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kowalsky, M.J. (1994), “Displacement-based design-a methodology for seismic design applied to RC bridge columns”, Master’s thesis, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lin, Y.Y. and Chang, K.C. (2003), “An Improved Capacity Spectrum Method for ATC-40, Earthq. Eng. Struct. D, 32(13), 2013–2025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maja, K. and Fajfar, P. (2012), “The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation”, Bull. Earth. Eng, 10(2), 695–715. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miranda, E. (2001) “Estimation of inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems”, J. Struct. Eng., 127(9), 1005–1012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1982), “Earthquake spectra and design”, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California. [Google Scholar]
  20. PEER Strong Motion Database [Online]. http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat. [Google Scholar]
  21. Priestley, M.J. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2000), “Direct Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Concrete Buildings”, Bull of the New Zealand Society for Earth Eng, 33(4), 421–444. [Google Scholar]
  22. Reinhorn, A.M. (1997), “Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations”, FajfarP. and KrawinklerH. (eds.), “Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes”, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp: 277–287. [Google Scholar]
  23. Reinhorn, A.M., Valles, R.E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2006), “IDARC 2D version 6.1-User’s Guide”, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sasaki, K.K., Freeman, S.A. and Paret, T.F. (1998), “Multimode pushover procedure (MMP)—A method to identify the effects of higher modes in a pushover analysis”, Proceeding of the 6th U.S. Nat. Conf. on Earthq. Eng, Seattle, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shih-Sheng P L, John M B (1980) Inelastic response spectra for a seismic building design. ASCE J Struct Div. 106(6):1295–1310. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wen, Y.K. (1976), “Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems”, J. Eng. Mech., 102(2), 249–263. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.