EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 119 (2017) MATEC Web Conf., 119 (2017) 01043 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 119, 2017
The Fifth International Multi-Conference on Engineering and Technology Innovation 2016 (IMETI 2016)
Article Number 01043
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711901043
Published online 04 August 2017
  1. T.C. Shin and T.L. Teng, An overview of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 91 (5), 895-913 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. K.S. Liu and Y.B. Tsai, Observed natural frequencies, damping ratios and mode shapes of vibration of a 30-story building excited by a major earthquake and typhoon, Earthquake Spectra, 26 (2), 371-397 (2010) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Turan, S.D. Hinchberger, E. Naggar, and M. Hesham, Seismic soil–structure interaction in buildings on stiff clay with embedded basement stories, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 50, 858-873 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C.C. Spyrakos, I.A. Koutromanos, and Ch.A. Maniatakis, Seismic response of base-isolated buildings including soil–structure interaction, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 658-668 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J.P. Stewart, G.L. Fenves, and R.B. Seed, Seismic soil–structure interaction in buildings. I: Analytical method, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125 (1), 26-37 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J.J. Johnson, Soil–structure interaction, In: W.F. Chen and C. Scawthorn, editors, Earthquake Engineering Handbook, Part 2, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (2003) [Google Scholar]
  7. FEMA 450. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures (2003 edition), Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), Washington DC, (2003) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Aviles and L.E. Perez-Rocha, Site effects and soil-structure interaction in the Valley of Mexico, Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 17, 29-39 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C.B. Crouse and J.C. Ramirez, Soil-structure interaction and site response at the Jensen Filtration Plant during the 1994 Northridge, California, mainshock and aftershocks, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 93 (2), 546-556 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. ATC, Guidelines for Using Strong-Motion Data and Shakemaps in Postearthquake Response, ATC-54 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, (2005) [Google Scholar]
  11. J.F. Clinton and T.H. Heaton, Is there a linear building transfer function for small excitation? EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 84 _46_, Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract, S51E-0102 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  12. D.A. Foutch, The vibrational characteristics of a twelve-storey steel frame building, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 6, 265-294 (1978) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M.D. Kohler, P.M. Davis, and E. Safak, Earthquake and ambient vibration monitoring of the steel-frame UCLA factor building., Earthquake Spectra, 21, 1-22 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Li and S.T. Mau., Learning from recorded earthquake motion of buildings, Journal of Structural Engineering, 123, 62-69 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Skolnik, Y. Lei, E. Yu, and J.W. Wallace, Identification, model updating, and response prediction of a 15-story steel frame building, Earthquake Spectra, 22, 781-802 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M.D. Trifunac, Comparisons between ambient and forced vibration experiments, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 1, 133-150 (1972) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Yu, D. Skolnik, D.H. Whang, and J.W. Wallace, Forced vibration testing of a vour-story reinforced concrete building utilizing the nees@ucla mobile field laboratory, Earthquake Spectra, 24, 969-995 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. K.S. Liu, T.C. Shin, and Y.B. Tsai, A free field strong motion network in Taiwan: TSMIP, TAO, 10 (2), 377-396 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  19. C.H. Loh and H.M. Lin, Application of off-line and on-line identification techniques to building seismic response data, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25, 269-290 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  20. G.W. Housner, Design spectrum, In Earthquake Engineering, (R. L. Weigel, Ed.), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1970) [Google Scholar]
  21. G.H. McVerry, Structural identification in the frequency domain from earthquake records, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 8, 161-180 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. P.C. Jennings, An introduction to the earthquake response of structures, In International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, (William Lee, Ed.), Academic Press, (2002) [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Safak, Detection and identification of soil-structure interaction in buildings from vibration recordings, J. Struct. Eng., 121, 899-906 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. Li and S.T. Mau., Anatomy of the loma prieta earthquake records of two steel buildings using mimo system identification, Proc., Conf. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, New York, 689-693 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  25. K.C. Tsai, C.H. Loh, C.H. Yeh, and C.M. Su, Design examples and the recommended modifications on the tentative seismic force provisions for building structures in Taiwan, Architecture & Building Institute, Ministry of Interior Research Project Report, Taipei (2001) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.