Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 119, 2017
The Fifth International Multi-Conference on Engineering and Technology Innovation 2016 (IMETI 2016)
Article Number 01030
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 04 August 2017
  1. C.E. Osgood, G.J. Suci, and P.H. Tannenbaum, The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press (Urbana, IL, 1957) [Google Scholar]
  2. W.K. Hung and L.L. Chen, How to measure product’s contradictory semantics, Journal of Design, 15 (4), 41-58 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  3. M.H. Lin, C.Y. Wang, S.K. Cheng, and S.H. Cheng, An event-related potential study of semantic style-match judgments of artistic furniture, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 82, 188-195 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M.H. Lin, Y.M. Fang, and C.Y. Wang, A preliminary study of applying ERP on users’ reactions to web pages with different presentation formats, The Science of Design, 57 (5), 89-98 (2011b) [Google Scholar]
  5. P.L. Gardner, Measuring ambivalence to science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24 (3), 241-247 (1987) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S.J. Breckler, A comparison of numerical indexes for measuring attitude ambivalence, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 350-365 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J.A. Russell, A circumplex model of affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (6), 1161-1178 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Plutchik and H.R. Conte, Circumplex Models of Personality and Emotions, American Psychological Association (Washington D.C, 1996) [Google Scholar]
  9. R.E. Thayer, The Biopsychology of Mood and Activation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989) [Google Scholar]
  10. C.M. Whissell, Pleasure and activation revisited: Dimensions underlying semantic responses to fifty randomly selected “emotional” words, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 871-874 (1981) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. K.A. Hsiao and L.L. Chen, Fundamental dimensions of affective responses to product shapes, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 553-564 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Hekkert, D. Snelders, and P.C.W. Van Wieringen, Most advanced, yet acceptable: Typicality and novel as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design, British Journal of Psychology 94, 111-124 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Fiell and P. Fiell, 1000 Chairs (Kolin. Taschen, New York, USA, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Hemachandra, 500 Chairs: Celebrating Traditional and Innovative Designs (Lark Books, New York, USA, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Passmore, Recent Philosophers: A Supplement to a Hundred Years of Philosophy (Duckworth Publishing, New York, USA, 1985) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Suwa, T. Purcell, and J.S. Gero, Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions, Design Studies, 19, 455-483 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C.L. Chong and N.M. Siew, Fostering students’ creativity through van hiele’s 5 phase-based tangram activities, Journal of Education and Learning, 3 (2), 66-80 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. C.P. Lin, Y.J. Shao, L.H. Wong, Y.J. Li, and J. Niramitranon, The impact of using synchronous collaborative virtual tangram in children’s geometric, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10 (2), 250-258 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  19. N.M. Siew, C.L. Chong, and M.R. Abdullah, Facilitating students’ geometric thinking through van hiele’s phase-based learning using tangram, Journal of Social Sciences, 9 (3), 101-111 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.