Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 104, 2017
2017 2nd International Conference on Mechanical, Manufacturing, Modeling and Mechatronics (IC4M 2017) – 2017 2nd International Conference on Design, Engineering and Science (ICDES 2017)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02023 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Chapter 2: Engineering Simulation, Modeling and Mechatronics | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710402023 | |
| Published online | 14 April 2017 | |
- TurboSquid, 3d models for professionals:: Turbosquid, http://www.turbosquid.com [Google Scholar]
- i.materialise, Online 3d printing service i.materialise, https://i.materialise.com [Google Scholar]
- Shapeways, Shapeways - 3d printing service and marketplace, https://www.shapeways.com [Google Scholar]
- G. McDonald, C. Roberts, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 3, 55 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Bhattacharjee, R.D. Gopal, G.L. Sanders, Communications of the ACM, 46, 107 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Fetscherin, M. Schmid, Comparing the Usage of Digital Rights Management Systems in the Music, Film, and Print Industry, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2003), ICEC ‘03, pp. 316–325, ISBN 158113-788-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/948005.948047 [Google Scholar]
- R.D. Gopal, G.L. Sanders, S. Bhattacharjee, M. Agrawal, S.C. Wagner, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 14, 89 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Q. Jiang, X. Feng, Y. Gong, L. Song, S. Ran, J. Cui, Computers and Geotechnics, 73, 210 (2016) [Google Scholar]
- O. Benedens, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19, 46 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Ohbuchi, H. Masuda, M. Aono, Watermarking three-dimensional polygonal models, in MULTIMEDIA’97 Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Multimedia (1997), pp. 261–272, ISBN 0-89791-991-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/266180.266377 [Google Scholar]
- E.D. Gelasca, T. Ebrahimi, M. Corsini, M. Barni, Objective evaluation of the perceptual quality of 3D watermarking, in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005 (2005), Vol. 1, pp. 1–4, ISSN 1522-4880, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2005.1529732 [Google Scholar]
- C.M. Chou, D.C. Tseng, International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 7, 328 (2007) [Google Scholar]
- Okada, P. Silapasuphakornwong, M. Suzuki, H. Torii, Y. Takashima, K. Uehira, Nondestructively reading out information embedded inside real objects by using far-infrared light (2015), Vol. 9599, pp. 1–7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2189486 [Google Scholar]
- K.D.D. Willis, A.D. Wilson, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) - SIGGRAPH 2013 Conference, 32, 1 (2013) [Google Scholar]
- F. Yu, H. Luo, Z. Lu, P. Wang, 3D Model Watermarking (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010), pp. 305–370, ISBN 978-3-642-12651-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12651-2_5 [Google Scholar]
- Makerbot Industries, Miraclegrue (beta), http://makerbot.github.io/Miracle-Grue (2012) [Google Scholar]
- Ranellucci, H.B. Andersen, N. Dandrimont, M. Hindness, P. Ledvina, Y. Sapir, M. Sheldrake, G. Hodgson, Slic3r – g-code generator for 3d printers, http://slic3r.org (2011) [Google Scholar]
- F. Baumann, H. Bugdayci, J. Grunert, F. Keller, D. Roller, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 13, 14 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- ISBN-Agentur für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Tech. rep. (2012), http://www.german-isbn.org/downloads/ISBN-Handbuch.pdf [Google Scholar]
- T.G. Team, Gimp – gnu image manipulation program, https://www.gimp.org (1996) [Google Scholar]
- Free Software Foundation, Bash – gnu project – free software foundation, https://www.gnu.org/software/bash (2007) [Google Scholar]
- Canon Europe, Canon canoscan lide 210 – canoscan flatbed photo & document scanners – canon europe, http://www.canon-europe.com/scanners/flatbed-scanners/canoscan_lide_210 (2012) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.