EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 90 (2017) MATEC Web Conf., 90 (2017) 01009 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 90, 2017
The 2nd International Conference on Automotive Innovation and Green Vehicle (AiGEV 2016)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20179001009
Published online 20 December 2016
  1. N. Amira, M. Ali, M. Hanif, A. Gafar, J. Akbar, Enhancing Promotional Strategies within Automotive Companies in Malaysia. Procedia Econ. Financ. 7, 158–163 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Choi, R. Narasimhan, S. W. Kim, Opening the technological innovation black box: The case of the electronics industry in Korea. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250, 192–203 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen, Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18, 509–533 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. A. Bayraktar, G. Hancerliogullari, B. Cetinguc, F. Calisir, Competitive strategies, innovation, and firm performance: an empirical study in a developing economy environment. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 7325, 1–15 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  5. R. M. Grant, The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage : Implications for Strategy Formulation. Calif. Manage. Rev. 114–135 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Barney, Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. J. Manage. 17, 99–120 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  7. J. B. Barney & W. S. Hesterly Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts. (Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice Hall, (2012)). [Google Scholar]
  8. C. S. Lioukas, J. J. Reuer, M. Zollo, Effects of Information Technology Capabilities on Strategic Alliances: Implications for the Resource-Based View. J. Manag. Stud. 53, 161–183 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Henderson, I. Cockburn, Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research. Strateg. Manag. J. 1–36 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Kong, Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, Study on the Evaluation of Technological Innovation Capability Under Uncertainty. 2008 4th Int. Conf. Wirel. Commun. Netw. Mob. Comput. 1–4 (2008). doi:10.1109/WiCom.2008.2999 [Google Scholar]
  11. Y.-L. Cheng, Y.-H. Lin, Performance Evaluation of Technological Innovation Capabilities In Uncertainty. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 40, 287–314 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D. J. Teece, Profiting from technological innovation : Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15, 285–305 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  13. R. C. M. Yam, W. Lo, E. P. Y. Tang, A. K. W. Lau, Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance : An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Res. Policy 40, 391–402 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Liu, Z. Jiang, Influence of technological innovation capabilities on product competitiveness. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116, 883–902 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Carbonell, A. I. Rodríguez-Escudero, Relationships among team’s organizational context, innovation speed, and technological uncertainty: An empirical analysis. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 26, 28–45 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. C. Guan, R. C. M. Yam, C. K. Mok, N. A Ma, Study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170, 971–986 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Prašnikar, M. Lisjak, A. R. Buhovac, Štembergar, M. Identifying and Exploiting the Inter relationships between Technological and Marketing Capabilities. Long Range Plann. 41, 530–554 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. J. Verdu, I. Tamayo, A. Ruiz-Moreno, The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between real options and technological innovation in high-tech firms. Technovation 32, 579–590 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Lang, S. Hsiang, T. Nguyen, T. Vy, Mediate effect of technology innovation capabilities investment capability and firm performance in Vietnam. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 40, 817–829 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Shan, D. R. Jolly, Technological innovation capabilities, product strategy, and firm performance: The electronics industry in China. Can. J. Adm. Sci. / Rev. Can. des Sci. l’Administration 30, 159–172 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. K.-P. Hung, C. Chou The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation 33, 368–380 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Z. Su, J. Peng, H. Shen, T. Xiao, Technological capability, marketing capability, and firm performance in turbulent conditions. Manag. Organ. Rev. 9, 115–137 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  23. B. J. Jaworski, A. K. Kohli, Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. J. Mark. 57, 53–70 (1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. K. H. Tsai, S. Y. Yang, The contingent value of firm innovativeness for business performance under environmental turbulence. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 10, 343–366 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Wilden, S. P. Gudergan, The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: investigating the role of environmental turbulence. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1–19 (2014). doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0380–y [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Ting, H. Wang, D. Wang, The moderating role of environmental dynamism on the influence of innovation strategy and firm performance. Int. J. Innov. Manag. Technol. 3, 13–16 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  27. D. Jiménez-Jiménez, R. Sanz-Valle, Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. J. Bus. Res. 64, 408–417 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Karagouni, I. Papadopoulos, The Impact of Technological Innovation Capabilities on the Competitiveness of a Mature Industry. Manag. Int. Bus. Econ. Syst. 1, 17–34 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Lahovnik, L. Breznik, Innovation Management and Technological Capabilities as A Source of Competitive Advantage. in Knowledge Management & Innovation International Conference 2013 19-21 June 2013 771–779 ((2013)). [Google Scholar]
  30. Y. Liang, D. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Impact of Technological Innovation Capability on Business Growth: An Empirical Study for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. 2010 Int. Conf. E-bus. E-Government 1177–1180 (2010). doi:10.1109/ICEE.2010.302 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. R. C. M. Yam, W. Lo, E. P. Y. Tang, K. W. Lau, Technological Innovation Capabilities and Firm Performance. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 42, 1009–1017 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  32. R. C. M. Yam, J. C. Guan, K. F. Pun, E. P. Y. Tang, An audit of technological innovation capabilities in chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Res. Policy 33, 1123–1140 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Camisón, A. Villar-López, Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. J. Bus. Res. 67, 2891–2902 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  34. M. C. De Stefano, M. J. Montes-sancho, T. Busch, A natural resource-based view of climate change: Innovation challenges in the automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.023 [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Oh, S.-K. Rhee, The influence of supplier capabilities and technology uncertainty on manufacturer-supplier collaboration: A study of the Korean automotive industry. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 28, 490–517 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. B. A Wernerfelt, Resource-based View of the Firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 5, 171–180 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  37. R. Amit, P. J. H. Schoemaker, Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strateg. Manag. J. 14, 33–46 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  38. C. E. Helfat, M. A. Peteraf, The dynamic resource-based view : capability lifecycles. Stategic Manag. J. 24, 997–1010 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  39. G. S. Day, The Capabilities of Market-Drive Organizations. J. Mark. 58, 37–52 (1994). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. J. J. Ferreira, S. G. Azevedo, rubén F. Ortiz, Contribution of resource-based view and entrepreneurial orientation on small firm growth. Cuad. Gest. 11, 95–116 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. V. M. U. Azubuike, Technological Innovation Capability and Firm’s Performance in New Product Development. Commun. IIMA 13, 43–56 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  42. J. Shan, D. R. Jolly, Accumulation of technological innovation capability and competitive performance: a quantitative study in chinese electronic information industry. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 9, 1–18 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. R. A. Burgelman, C. M. Christensen, S. C. Wheelwright, Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, (2009)). [Google Scholar]
  44. R. I. Sabir, R. M. Sabir, Managing technological innovation: China’s strategy and challenges. J. Technol. Manag. China 5, 213–226 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. S. L. Newbert, Value. Rareness, Competitive Advantage and Performance: A Conceptual - Level Empirical Investigation of the Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 768, 745–768 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  46. L. Radu, Investments in Technological Innovations : a Literature Review of Organization Determinants. Eur. Sci. J. 1, 52–59 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  47. V. Zemlickienè, Analysis of High-Technology Product Development. Intellect. Econ. 5, 283–297 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  48. J. B. Barney, Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck and Business Strategy. Manage. Sci. 32, 1231–1241 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  49. S. L. Newbert, Empirical Research on Resource-Based View of the Firm: An Assessment and Suggestions for Future Research. Strateg. Manag. J. 146, 121–146 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  50. J. F. Christensen, Asset profiles for technological innovation. Res. Policy 24, 727–745 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. V. Chiesa, P. Coughlan, C. A. Voss, Development of a Technical Innovation Audit. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 13, 105–136 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. A. K. W. Lau, R. C. M. Yam, E. P. Y. Tang, The impact of technological innovation capabilities on innovation performance An empirical study in Hong Kong. J. Sci. Technol. Policy China 1, 163–186 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. A. K. W. Lau, E. Baark, W. L. W. Lo, The effects of innovation sources and capabilities on product competitiveness in Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta. Asian J. Technol. Innov. 21, 220–236 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. M. M. Yusr, S. S. M. Mokhtar, A. R. Othman, The effect of TQM practices on technological innovation capabilities: Applying on Malaysian manufacturing sector. Int. J. Qual. Res. 8, 197–216 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  55. D. Howell, C. Windahl, R. Seidel, A project contingency framework based on uncertainty and its consequences. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 28, 256–264 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. E. Fredericks, Infusing flexibility into business-to-business firms : A contingency theory and resource-based view perspective and practical implications B. Ind. Mark. Manag. 34, 555–565 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. S. C. Betts, Contingency Theory : Science Or Technology ? J. Bus. Econ. Res. 1, 123–130 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  58. G. Wang, W. Dou, W. Zhu, N. Zhou, The effects of firm capabilities on external collaboration and performance : The moderating role of market turbulence. J. Bus. Res. 1–9 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  59. D. I. Prajogo, The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. Intern. J. Prod. Econ. 171, 241–249 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  60. K. Tsai, S. Yang, Firm innovativeness and business performance : The joint moderating effects of market turbulence and competition. Ind. Mark. Manag. 42, 1279–1294 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. C. Terawatanavong, G. J. Whitwell, R. E. Widing, A. O. Cass, Technological turbulence, supplier market orientation, and buyer satisfaction. J. Bus. Res. 64, 911–918 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. J. Guan, N. Ma, Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation 23, 737–747 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. M. V. Türker, A model proposal oriented to measure technological innovation capabilities of business firms – a research on automotive industry. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 41, 147–159 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. W. Wu, D. Liang, B. Yu, Y. Yang, Strategic planning for management of technology of China’ s high technology enterprises. J. Technol. Manag. China 5, 6–25 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. K. Liao, X. Deng, E. Marsillac, Factors that influence Chinese automotive suppliers’ mass customization capabilities. Intern. J. Prod. Econ. 146, 25–36 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. A. I. Ismail, R. C. Rose, J. Uli, H. Abdullah, The Relationship Between Organisational Resources, Capabilities, Systems and Competitive Advantage. Asian Acad. Manag. J. 17, 151–173 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  67. L. Santos-vijande, A, L. I. Santos-vijande, Innovativeness and organizational innovation in total quality oriented firms : The moderating role of market turbulence. 27, 514–532 (2007). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.