Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 90, 2017
The 2nd International Conference on Automotive Innovation and Green Vehicle (AiGEV 2016)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 16
Published online 20 December 2016
  1. KPMG, “Self-Driving Cars: Are We Ready?,” (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. KPMG, “Self-Driving Cars : The Next Revolution,” (2012) [Google Scholar]
  3. T. M. Gasser and D. Westhoff, “BASt-study : Definitions of Automation and Legal Issues in Germany,” (2012) [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Elander, R. West, and D. French, “Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: An examination method and findings,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 279–294, (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Taubman-Ben-Ari, M. Mikulincer, and O. Gillath, “The multidimensional driving style inventory - Scale construct and validation,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 323–332, (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Vaa, “From Gibson and Crooks to Damasio: The role of psychology in the development of driver behaviour models,” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 25, pp. 112–119, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Summala, “Towards understanding motivational and emotional factors in driver behaviour: Comfort through satisficing,” in Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments: Critical Issues in Driver Interactions with Intelligent Transport Systems, (2007), pp. 189–207 [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Le Vine, A. Zolfaghari, and J. Polak, “Autonomous cars: The tension between occupant experience and intersection capacity,” Transp. Res. Part C, vol. 52, pp. 1–14, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Diels and J. E. Bos, “Self-driving carsickness,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 53, pp. 374–382, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Sivak and B. Schoettle, “Motion Sickness in Self-Driving Vehicles (Report No. UMTRI-2015-12),” (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. V. Bogdanović and N. Ruškić, “The research of vehicle acceleration at signalized intersections,” Traffic Transp., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 33–42, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. I. El-Shawarby, H. Rakha, V. Inman, and G. Davis, “Evaluation of Driver Deceleration Behavior at Signalized Intersections,” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, pp. 29–35, (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Hugemann and D. Nickel, “Longitudinal and Lateral Accelerations in Normal Day Driving,” in 6th International Conference of The Institute of Traffic Accident Investigators, (2003) [Google Scholar]
  14. Parsons Brinckerhoff Team, “California High Speed Train Program Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement: Engineering Criteria,” (2004) [Google Scholar]
  15. TCRP, TCRP Report 155 – Track Design Handbook for Light Rail Transit, Second Edition. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  16. P. A. Weber and J. P. Braaksma, “Towards a North American geometric design standard for speed humps,” ITE J. (Institute Transp. Eng., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 30–34, (2000) [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Wang and S. M. Lukic, “Review of driving conditions prediction and driving style recognition based control algorithms for hybrid electric vehicles,” 2011 IEEE Veh. Power Propuls. Conf. VPPC 2011, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Gulian, G. Matthews, A. I. Glendon, D. R. Davies, and L. M. Debney, “Dimensions of driver stress,” Ergonomics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 585–602, (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Reason, A. Manstead, S. Stradling, J. Baxter, and K. Campbell, “Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?.pdf,” Ergonomics, vol. 33, no. 10/11, pp. 1315–1332, (1990) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Kuderer, S. Gulati, and W. Burgard, “Learning Driving Styles for Autonomous Vehicles from Demonstration,” 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., vol. 134, pp. 2641–2646, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Huang, “OBD-II Telematics Advanced Kit (Arduino MEGA 2560),” (2014) [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Taswell, “The what, how, and why of wavelet shrinkage denoising,” Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–11, (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C. W. Kang, C. H. Kang, and C. G. Park, “Wavelet Denoising Technique for Improving of the Low Cost MEMS-GPS Integrated Navigation Sytems,” Inetrnational Symp. GPS/GNSS, pp. 3–8, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  24. A. M. Hasan, K. Samsudin, A. R. Ramli, and R. S. Azmir, “Wavelet-based pre-filtering for low cost inertial sensors,” J. Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 2217–2230, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Misiti, Y. Misiti, G. Oppenheim, and J.-M. Poggi, Wavelet toolbox. (1996) [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Brol and J. Mamala, “Assessment of passenger car driveability with use of two axis accelerometer mounted on car body,” J. Ultragarsas, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 31–36, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  27. G. Reymond, AKemeny, J. Droulez, and A Berthoz, “Role of lateral acceleration in curve driving: driver model and experiments on a real vehicle and a driving simulator.,” Hum. Factors, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 483–495, (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. G. Charlton, “The role of attention in horizontal curves: A comparison of advance warning, delineation, and road marking treatments,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 873–885, (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Institute of Transportation Engineers, “Traffic Calming: State of the Practice - Chapter 6: Legal Authority and Liability,” (1999) [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Shirahatti, “Investigation on effect of hump on a vehicle suspension for the comfortable ride,” in National Conference on Emerging Trends in Mechanical, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  31. B. Schoettle and M. Sivak, “Public Opinion About Self-Driving Vehicles in China, India, Japan, The U.S., The U.K. and Australia,” (2014) [Google Scholar]
  32. J. A. Healey and R. W. Picard, “Detecting Stress During Real-World Driving Tasks Using Physiological Sensors,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 156–166, (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. D. J. Fagnant and K. Kockelman, “Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations for Capitalizing on Self-Driven Vehicles,” in 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2014, (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.