EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 87 (2017) MATEC Web Conf., 87 (2017) 03008 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 87, 2017
The 9th International Unimas Stem Engineering Conference (ENCON 2016) “Innovative Solutions for Engineering and Technology Challenges”
Article Number 03008
Number of page(s) 7
Section Chemical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20178703008
Published online 12 December 2016
  1. H. Strathmann, L. Giorno, E. Drioli, An Introduction to Membrane Science and Technology, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. C.M. Lewandowski, A Brief Mindfulness Intervention on Acute Pain Experience: An Examination of Individual Difference., 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Yurekli, Removal of heavy metals in wastewater by using zeolite nano-particles impregnated polysulfone membranes, J. Hazard. Mater. 309 (2016) 53–64. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.064. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Fu, Q. Wang, Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review, J. Environ. Manage. 92 (2011) 407–418. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011. [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Bernard, A Jimoh, J.O. Odigure, Heavy Metals Removal from Industrial Wastewater by Activated Carbon Prepared from Coconut Shell, Res. J. Chem. Sci. 3 (2013) 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  6. M.J.K. Ahmed, M. Ahmaruzzaman, A review on potential usage of industrial waste materials for binding heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions, J. Water Process Eng. 10 (2016) 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.01.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Fazal, B. Zhang, Z. Zhong, L. Gao, X. Chen, Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Using MBR (Membrane Bioreactor) Review Study, J. Environ. Prot. (Irvine,. Calif). 6 (2015) 584–598. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H.A. Hegazi, Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using agricultural and industrial wastes as adsorbents, HBRC J. 9 (2013) 276–282. doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.08.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Karnib, A. Kabbani, H. Holail, Z. Olama, Heavy metals removal using activated carbon, silica and silica activated carbon composite, in: Energy Procedia, 2014: pp. 113–120. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Lakherwal, Adsorption of Heavy Metals: A Review, Int. J. Environ. Res. Dev. 4 (2014) 2249–3131. doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9401–5. [Google Scholar]
  11. A.F. Ismail, A.R. Hassan, Effect of additive contents on the performances and structural properties of asymmetric polyethersulfone (PES) nanofiltration membranes, 55 (2007) 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2006.11.002. [Google Scholar]
  12. L.L. Hwang, J.C. Chen, M.Y. Wey, The properties and filtration efficiency of activated carbon polymer composite membranes for the removal of humic acid, Desalination. 313 (2013) 166–175. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2012.12.019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Lin, K. Wang, Y. Feng, J.Z. Liu, X. Fang, T. Xu, H. Wang, Composite ultrafiltration membranes from polymer and its quaternary phosphonium-functionalized derivative with enhanced water flux, J. Memb. Sci. 482 (2015) 67–75. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P.F. Andrade, A.F. de Faria, S.R. Oliveira, M.A.Z. Arruda, M. do C. Gonçalves, Improved antibacterial activity of nanofiltration polysulfone membranes modified with silver nanoparticles, Water Res. 81 (2015) 333–342. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. H.L. Richards, P.G.L. Baker, E. Iwuoha, Metal Nanoparticle Modified Polysulfone Membranes for Use in Wastewater Treatment: A Critical Review, J. Surf. Eng. Mater. Adv. Technol. 02 (2012) 183–193. doi:10.4236/jsemat.2012.223029. [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Li, S. Liu, J. Liu, Surface modification of coconut shell based activated carbon for the improvement of hydrophobic VOC removal, J. Hazard. Mater. 192 (2011) 683–690. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.069. [Google Scholar]
  17. X. Yao, J. Liu, G. Gong, Y. Jiang, Q. Xie, Preparation and modification of activated carbon for benzene adsorption by steam activation in the presence of KOH, Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 23 (2013) 395–401. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.05.015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Alcañiz-Monge, M.J. Illán-Gómez, Insight into hydroxides-activated coals: Chemical or physical activation?, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 318 (2008) 35–41. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Eren, A. Sarihan, B. Eren, H. Gumus, F.O. Kocak, Preparation, characterization and performance enhancement of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane using PBI as hydrophilic modifier, J. Memb. Sci. 475 (2015) 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. P.S.S. Goh, A.F.F. Ismail, S.M.M. Sanip, B.C.C. Ng, M. Aziz, Recent advances of inorganic fillers in mixed matrix membrane for gas separation, Sep. Purif. Technol. 81 (2011) 243–264. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.07.042. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.