Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 81, 2016
2016 5th International Conference on Transportation and Traffic Engineering (ICTTE 2016)
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Traffic Control
Published online 25 October 2016
  1. B. Flyvbjerg, N. Bruzelius, & W. Rothengatter, Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2003) [CrossRef]
  2. M. Pacione, Dubai, Cities, 22, no. 3, pp. 255–265, (2005) [CrossRef]
  3. K. Beck & C. Andres, Extreme programming explained: Embrace change, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, (2004)
  4. M. Giezen, Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning, International Journal of Project Management, 30, no. 7, pp. 781–790, (2012) [CrossRef]
  5. W. R. Scott, R. E. Levitt, & R. J. Orr, Global projects: Institutional and political challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2011) [CrossRef]
  6. PMI, A guide to the project management body of knowledge (5th ed.): Project Management Institute, Inc., Newtown Square, (2013)
  7. H. P. Berg, Risk management: Procedures, methods and experiences, Rsik Management, 1, no. 6, pp. 79–95, (2010)
  8. KPMG, How to successfully manage your mega-project, KPMG International Cooperative,
  9. http://us/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/pages/how-to-manage-mega-project.aspx. Accessed March 5, (2013)
  10. D. Cooper, S. Grey, G. Raymond, & P. Walker, Project risk management guidelines: Managing risk in large projects and complex procurements, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, (2005)
  11. O. Renn, The role of risk perception for risk management, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 59, no. 1, pp. 49–62, (1998)
  12. H. Drummond, MIS and illusions of control: an analysis of the risks of risk management, Journal of Information Technology, 26, no. 4, pp. 259–267, (2011) [CrossRef]
  13. H. F. Cervone, Project risk management, OCLC Systems & Services, 22, no. 4, pp. 256–262, (2006) [CrossRef]
  14. C. Traeger, Conducting a business impact analysis, Faulkner Information Services, Docid: 0018494, (2005)
  15. Z. F. Lansdowne, Risk matrix: an approach for prioritizing risks and tracking risk mitigation progress, Proceedings of the 30th Annual Project Management Institute, Philadelphia, PA, October, pp. 10–16, (1999)
  16. T. Kendrick, Identifying and managing project risk: essential tools for failure-proofing your project, AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn., New York, (2003)
  17. S. H. Han, D. Y. Kim, H. Kim, & W. S. Jang, A web-based integrated system for international project risk management, Automation in Construction, 17, no. 3, pp. 342–356, (2008) [CrossRef]
  18. V. T. Luu, S. Y. Kim, N. V. Tuan, & S. O. Ogunlana, Quantifying schedule risk in construction projects using Bayesian belief networks, International Journal of Project Management, 27, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2009 [CrossRef]
  19. P. Love, C. Sing, X. Wang, D. Edwards, & H. Odeyinka, Probability distribution fitting of schedule overruns in construction projects, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64, no. 8, pp. 1231–1247, (2013) [CrossRef]
  20. A. Öztaş, & Ö. Ökmen, Judgmental risk analysis process development in construction projects, Building and Environment, 40, no. 9, pp. 1244–1254, (2005) [CrossRef]
  21. Ö. Ökmen & A. Öztaş, Construction project network evaluation with correlated schedule risk analysis model, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134, no. 1, pp. 49–63, (2008) [CrossRef]
  22. D. Schatteman, W. Herroelen, S. Van de Vonder, & A. Boone, Methodology for integrated risk management and proactive scheduling of construction projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134, no. 11, pp. 885–893, (2008) [CrossRef]
  23. M. Vanhoucke, On the dynamic use of project performance and schedule risk information during projecttracking, Omega, 39, no. 4, pp. 416–426, (2011)
  24. S. F. Moosavi & O. Moselhi, Schedule assessment and evaluation, Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, West Lafayette, pp. 535–544, (2012)
  25. G. Jia, F. Yang, G. Wang, B. Hong, & R. You, A study of mega project from a perspective of social conflict theory, International Journal of Project Management, 29, no. 7, pp. 817–827, (2011) [CrossRef]
  26. B. M. Byrne, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, Routledge, (2013)
  27. M. Mainul Islam & O. O. Faniran, Structural equation model of project planning effectiveness, Construction Management and Economics, 23, no. 2, pp. 215–223, (2005) [CrossRef]
  28. K. Molenaar, S. Washington, & J. Diekmann, Structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126, no. 4, pp. 268–277, (2000) [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.