Course Selection with AHP & PROMETHEE Methods for Post Graduate Students: An Application in Kirikkale University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences

Open Access

Issue		MATEC Web Conf. Volume 68, 2016 2016 The 3^rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA 2016)


Article Number		20004
Number of page(s)		7
Section		Information Education and Learning
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166820004
Published online		01 August 2016

A. Demir, Üniversitedeki Seçmeli Ders Uygulamasının Öğrenciler ve Öğretim Üyelerince Değerlendirilmesi, PDRD, 2 7 (1996). [Google Scholar]
Z. Anik, Nesne Yönelimli Yazılım Dillerinin Analitik Hiyerarşi ve Analitik Network Prosesi ile Karşılaştırılması ve Değerlendirilmesi, GÜ, (2007). [Google Scholar]
T. L. Saaty, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. JSS, 1 1 (2008). [Google Scholar]
J. P. Brans, P. H. Vincke, A preference ranking organization method: The PROMETHEE method, MS, 31 647–656 (1982). [Google Scholar]
M. Dağdeviren, & E. Eraslan, Promethee Sıralama Yöntemi ile Tedarikçi Seçimi, GÜMMF, 23 69–75. (2008). [Google Scholar]
B. E. Woolnough, Why Students Choose Physics, or Reject It. Physics Education, 29 368–374 (1994). [Google Scholar]
V. Bewick, & J. Southern, Factors Influencing Students’ Choice of Mathematics at A-Level. TMIA 16 74–78 (1997). [Google Scholar]
F. R. Isobel, Influences on Choice of Course Made by University. Year 1 Bioscience Students a Case Study. IJSE, 22, 1201–1218. (2000). [Google Scholar]
S. P. Hodgkinson, & J. M. Innes, The Attitudinal Influence of Career Orientation in 1 st-Year University Students: Environmental Attitudes as a Function of Degree Choice. JEE, 32, 37–40. (2001). [Google Scholar]
S. Dündar, Ders Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses Uygulaması. SDUJFE & AS, 13 (2008). [Google Scholar]
H. Tezcan, & Y. Gümüş, Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Seçmeli Ders Tercihlerine Etki Eden Faktörlerin Araştırılmasi. GEFD, 28 1–17 (2008). [Google Scholar]
V. A. Salomon, F. S. Duarte, J. L. Junior, & N. Paula, Faculty selection for a Brazilian private higher education institution. In International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1 (2009). [Google Scholar]
Ö. Aydin, S. Öznehir, E. Akcali, Ankara İçin Optimal Hastane Yeri Seçiminin Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci İle Modellenmesi. SDÜİ ve İBFD, 14 69–86 (2009). [Google Scholar]
B. S. Kutlu, Y. A. Abali, T. Eren, Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri İle Seçmeli Ders Seçimi. KÜSBD, 2 5–25 (2012). [Google Scholar]
A. Bansal, P. Kumar, 3PL selection using hybrid model of AHP-PROMETHEE, IJS & OM, 14 373–397 (2013). [Google Scholar]
N. Bedir, T. Eren, AHP-PROMETHEE Yöntemleri Entegrasyonu İle Personel Seçim Problemi: Perakende Sektöründe Bir Uygulama, 16. Uluslararası Ekonometri, Yöneylem Araştırması Ve İstatistik Sempozyumu, 16 (2015). [Google Scholar]
N. Bedir, E. H. Özder, T. Eren, The Third Party Logistics Firm Selection Using AHP-PROMETHEE Methods. 13th International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress: 13 (2015). [Google Scholar]
H. Kazan, S. Özçelik, & E. H. Hobikoğlu, Election of Deputy Candidates for Nomination with AHP-Promethee Methods. P-SBS, 195 603–613 (2015). [Google Scholar]
T. L. Saaty, How to Make a Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Interfaces, 6 19–43 (1994), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
J. P. Brans, P. H. Vincke, B. Mareschall, How to select and how to rank projects:The PROMETHEE method, EJOR, 14 228–238 (1986). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
R. S. Bhatti, P. Kumar, & D. Kumar, A Fuzzy AHP model for 3PL selection in Lead Logistics Provider scenarios. EIS & IIICI, 1 261–277 (2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.