Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00074
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. Bnpb B. N. (2009). West Sumatra and Jambi Natural Disasters: Damage, Loss and Preliminary Needs Assessment. Jakarta: Bappenas. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chan N. W. (1995). Flood disaster management in Malaysia: an evaluation of the effectiveness of government resettlement. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 4 Iss 4, 22–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan N. W. (1997). Increasing Flood Risk in Malaysia: Causes and Solutions. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 6 Iss 2, 72–86. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chan N. W. (1998). Institutional Arrangements for Flood Hazarad Management in Malaysia: An Evaluation Using the Criteria Approach. Disasters , vol.21, no.3, 206–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coburn A. (1989). Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Reduction Strategies for Housing in Eastern Turkey. University of Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  6. Corfu C. R.(2014). Flood Impact Assessment Literature Review. Exeter: University of Exeter. [Google Scholar]
  7. Daungthima W., & Kazunori H. (2012). Assessing the flood impacts and the cultural properties. The 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Future for Human Security (pp. 739–748). Elsevier B.V. [Google Scholar]
  8. Eefit E. E. (2003). Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team. Japan. [Google Scholar]
  9. EMS-98, E. M.-s. (1998). Classification of Damage Scale. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fema F. E. (2005). Preliminary Damage Assessment for Individual Assistance: Operations Manual. United States of America. [Google Scholar]
  11. Florida D. O. (2004). Handbook for Disaster Assistance. Tallahassee: State of Florida. [Google Scholar]
  12. Friedland C. J. (2009). Residential Building Damage from Hurricane Storm Surge: Proposed Methodologies to Describe, Assess and Model Building Damage. Louisiana. [Google Scholar]
  13. Friedland C., & Levitan M. &. (2008). Development of a Hurricane Storm Surge Damage Model for Residential Structures. Solutions to Coastal Disasters Proceedings. Oahu, Hawaii. [Google Scholar]
  14. Green C., Turnstall S., Emery J., & Bossman-Aggrey P. (1988). Evaluating the Non-monetary Impacts of Flooding. Enfield: Flood Hazarad Research centre. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hodde H. B.III, (2012). The Damage Assessment Process: Evaluating Coastal Storm Damage Assessments in Texas After Hurricane IKE. Ann Arbor: ProQuest LLC 2013. [Google Scholar]
  16. Horbostel C. (1978). Construction Materials Type: Uses and Aplications. Wiley, New York. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jonkman S. N., Bockarjova M., Kok M., & Bernadini P. (2008). Integrated Hydrodynamic and Economic Modelling of Flood Damage in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 77–90. [Google Scholar]
  18. Messner F., Penning-Roswell E., Green C., Meyer V., Tunstall S., & Van Der Veen A. (2007). Evaluating Flood Damages: Guidance and Recommmendations on Principles and Methods. Project F (ed). [Google Scholar]
  19. Mnsc, M. N. (2015, April 26). Malaysian National Security Council. Retrieved 9 21, 2015, from Majlis Keselamatan Negara: [Google Scholar]
  20. Mohd Razali A., & Fashbir N. ((pnyt.)). “Perbandaran Perancangan Persekitaran”. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nicholas J., Holt G., & Proverbs G. (2001). Towards Standardising The Assessment of FLood Damaged Properties in the UK. 163–172. [Google Scholar]
  22. Shah A., Khan H. M., & Qazi E. U. (2013). Damage Assessment of Flood Affected Mud Houses in Pakistan. Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences, 99–110. [Google Scholar]
  23. South Asian Tsunami D. A. (2005). Indonesia: Preliminary Damage and Loss Assessement: The December 26, 2004 National Disaster. The Consultative Group on Indonesia. [Google Scholar]
  24. Widstedt R. (1927). The Great Flood 1926. Journal of the Malaysan Branch of Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 11, 259–309. [Google Scholar]
  25. (2004). Damage Assessment Manual by [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.