Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00072
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. PWD. Dasar Pengurusan Aset Kerajaan. Kuala Lumpur (2009) [Google Scholar]
  2. MihaiF., BinningN., & DowlingL. A Framework for Assessing Asset Management Performance In Australia. Australia: Main Roads Western Australia. (2002) [Google Scholar]
  3. (INGENIUM), A. o. (2006). International Infrastructure Management Manual. New Zealand: Institute of Public Works Engineering of Australia. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  4. (CIC), C. I. (1996). Definitions of Inspections and Surveys of Buildings. London: CIC. (1996) [Google Scholar]
  5. Joao Antonio Costa Branco Oliveira Pedro J. A. Portuguese method for building condition assessment. Journal of Structural Survey, 25(34), 322–335 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. RamlyA. Panduan Kerja-kerja Pemeriksaan Kecacatan Bangunan. Malaysia: Hizi Print Sdn. Bhd. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  7. WordsworthP. Lee’s building Maintenance Management, 4th edition. Oxford Blackwell Science Ltd. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  8. StraubA. Dutch Standard for Condition Assessment of Buildings. Journal of Structural Survey, 27(1), 233–35. (2009) [Google Scholar]
  9. PWD. Manual Pengurusan Aset Kerajaan (MPAM). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Public work Department. (2009) [Google Scholar]
  10. PWD. Building Condition Inspection for Existing Building. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Public Work Department. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. AbbottG. R., Mc DulingJ. J., DrP. S., & SchoemanJ. C. Building Condition Assessment: A Performance evaluation tool towards sustainable asset management. CIB World Building Congress, 649–662. (2007) [Google Scholar]
  12. KemptonJ., AlaniA., & ChapmanK. (2001). Surveyor variability in educational stock survey-a lens model study. Journal of Facilities, 20(5/6), 190–197. (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. KemptonJ., NicholS., AnumbaC., & DickenJ. Surveyor variability in large-scale house condition survey. Journal of Structural Survey, 19(4), 156–162. (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. PittT. J. Data Requirements for the prioritization of predictive building maintenance. Journal of Facilities, 15(3/4), 97–104. (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. NEN, 2. Condition Assessment of Building and Installation Components. Dutch: NEN. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  16. KleinerY. Scheduling Inspection and Renewal of Large Infrastructure Asset. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 7(4), 136–143. (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. HamzahN., MahliM., Che AniA. I., TahirM., AbdullahN., & TawilN. The Development of Smart School Condition Assessment Based on Condition Survey Protocol (CSP) 1 Matrix: A Literature Review. Science, Engineering and Technology, 620–625. (2010) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.