Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00054
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600054
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. Alexander, K. (1996). Facilities Management: Theory and Practice. London & New York: Taylor & Francis Group [CrossRef]
  2. Abd Rahman Mohd Noor (2008). Pengurusan Hartanah Komersial dan Awam, Edisi Kedua, Leeds Publications, Petaling Jaya, Selangor
  3. Amaratunga, D. et al. (2000) Assessment of facilities management performance – what next? Facilities, 18 (1/2), pp. 66–75.
  4. Atkin, B. and Brooks, A. (2000), Total Facilities Management, Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K
  5. Barrett, P (2004). Facilities Management: Towards Best Practice, Blackwell Science, London.
  6. Becker, F. (1990), The Total Workplace, Van Nostrand Reinhold. New York, NY
  7. Bernard Williams May/June (1996): Cost-effective facilities management: a practical approach pp.26–38
  8. British Institute of Facilities Management (2003) British Institute of Facilities Management, Available at: http://www.bifm.org.uk
  9. British Institute of Facilities Management (2011) British Institute of Facilities Management, Available at: http://www.bifm.org.uk
  10. Construction Industrial Development Board (CIDB) (2010), Newsletter [on-line], Malaysia, Published by CIDB, available at: www.cidb.gov.my/v6/?q_en/content/533 (accessed December 2015).
  11. Elyna Myeda Nik Pitt Michael (2014). Facilities management in Malaysia. Facilities. Vol. 32 (9/10), pp. 490–508 [CrossRef]
  12. Hinks, J. and McNay, P. (1999), “The creation of a management-by-variance tool for facilities management performance assessment”, Facilities, Vol. 17 Nos 1/2, pp. 48–60.
  13. IFMA (2003), Facts about the International Facility Management Association, available at: www.ifma.org
  14. International Facilities Management Association (2008) International Facilities Management Association (IFMA), Available at: http://www.ifma.org
  15. International Facilities Management Association (2011) International Facilities Management Association (IFMA), Available at: http://www.ifma.org
  16. Jensen, P. A. (2011). Organisation of facilities management in relation to core business. Journal of Facilities Management. 9, pp. 78–95. [CrossRef]
  17. Mohd Fadzil Mat Yasin (2013). The contributions of knowledge mapping in facilities performance evaluation practice in Malaysia
  18. Myzatul Aishah Kamarazaly, Jasper Mbachu and Robyn Phipps (2013). Challenges faced by facilities managers in the Australasian universities. Journal of Facilities Management. 11 (2), pp. 136–151 [CrossRef]
  19. N.E.M. Nik-Mat et al. (2011). Assessing the Maintenance Aspect of Facilities Management through a Performance Measurement System: A Malaysian Case Study. Procedia Engineering. 20, pp. 329–338 [CrossRef]
  20. Nutt, B. (2000), “Four competing futures for facility management”, Facilities, Vol. 18 Nos 3/4, pp. 124–132. [CrossRef]
  21. Pheng, L.S. (1996). Total Quality Facilities Management: A Framework for Implementation. Facilities. 14(5/6), 5–13. [CrossRef]
  22. Public Works Department Annual Report (2009), Public Works Department Annual Report, Malaysia, Published by PWD, available at: www.jkr.gov.my/jkr4/index.php?r_page/view&id_161
  23. Rozilah Kasim (2011). Community-based Facilities Management: Theory and Practices. Penerbit UTHM, Johor
  24. S. Parmjit, Y. F. Chan, and K. S. Gurnam, A comprehensive guide to writing a research proposal. Venton Publishing, Batu Caves, Malaysia, 2006.
  25. Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman and Emma Marinie Ahmad Zawawi, (2010). Development of facilities management in Malaysia. Journal of Facilities Management. 8 (1), pp. 75–81 [CrossRef]
  26. Teicholz, E., and Noferi, C. (2002) ‘Higher ED integrates CAFM better. Facilities Design and Management. 1, pp.13–14.
  27. Wanlaya Patanapiradej (2006).The Scope of Facility Management. Nakhara. 6, p. 75–90
  28. W.S.Z Wan-Hamdan et al (2011). Contribution of Facilities Management Process in Supporting Malaysia National Higher Education Strategic Plan. Procedia Engineering, 20, p. 180–187 [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.