Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 61, 2016
The International Seminar on Applied Physics, Optoelectronics and Photonics (APOP 2016)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 4
Section Chapter 4 Information Technology
Published online 28 June 2016
  1. Howard, A. D. (1994). “A detachment-limited model of drainage basin evolution.” Water Resour. Res., 30, 2261–2285. [CrossRef]
  2. Tucker, G. E., and Slingerland, R. L. (1994). “Erosional dynamics, flexural isostasy, and long-lived escarpments: A numerical modeling study”. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 12, 229–12, 243. [CrossRef]
  3. Whipple, K. X., and Tucker, G. E. (2002). “Implications of sediment-flux dependent river incision models for landscape evolution”. J. Geophys. Res., 107(B2), 2039, doi: 10.1029/2000JB000044. [CrossRef]
  4. Sklar, L. S., and Dietrich, W. E. (2004). “A mechanistic model for river incision into bedrock by saltating bed load”. Water Resour. Res., 40, W06301, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002496. [CrossRef]
  5. Gasparini, N. M., Bras, R. L., and Whipple, K. X. (2006). Numerical modeling of non-steady-state river profile evolution using a sedimentflux-dependent incision model, in Tectonics, Climate and Landscape Evolution, edited by S. Willett et al., GSA Special Paper 398, Penrose Conference Series, Geol. Soc. of Am., 127–141.
  6. Lamb, M. P., Dietrich, W. E. and Sklar, L. S. (2008). “A model for fluvial bedrock incision by impacting suspended and bedload sediment”. J. Geophys. Res., 113, F03025, doi: 10.1029/2007JF000915.
  7. Lai, Y. G., Greimann, B. P., and Wu, K. (2010). “Soft bedrock erosion modeling with a two-dimensional depth-averaged model”. J. Hydraul. Eng., 137 (8), 804–814. [CrossRef]
  8. Whipple, K. X., Hancock, G. S., and Anderson, R. S. (2000). “River incision into bedrock: Mechanics and relative efficacy of plucking, abrasion, and cavitation.” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 112 (3), 490–503. [CrossRef]
  9. Lai, Y. G., and Greimann, B. P. (2009). “Rock erosion modeling for rivers in Taiwan and progress report of bank erosion and turbidity current modeling”. Technical Rep. SRH-2009-40, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Denver.
  10. Bollaert, E. F. R., and Schleiss, A. J. (2005). “Physically based model for evaluation of rock scour due to high-velocity jet impact”. J. Hydraul. Eng., 131 (3), 153–165. [CrossRef]
  11. Sklar, L. S., and Dietrich,W. E. (2006). “The role of sediment in controlling steady-state bed channel slope: Implications of the saltation-abrasion incision model”. Geomorphology, 82(1-2), 58–83. [CrossRef]
  12. Tomkin, J. H., Brandon, M. T., Pazzaglia, F. J., Barbour, J. R., and Willet, S. D. (2003). “Quantitative testing of bedrock incision models for the Clearwater River, NW Washington State”. J. Geophys. Res., 108(B6), 1–19.
  13. Li, C. H, Gu, S. Z. (1992). “A study on the characteristics of soil and water loss in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and corresponding countermeasures”. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 12, 1–6 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  14. Wang, X. T. (1998). “The control of soil and water loss in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and agricultural and rural sustainable development”. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 12, 40–44 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  15. Zhang, J., Zhang, Z.F., Liu, S.M.,Wu, Y., Xiong, H., Chen, H.T. (1999). “Human impacts on the large world rivers: Would the Changjiang (Yangtze River) be an illustration?” Global Biogeochemistry Cycles, 13, 1099–1105. [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, J.Y., Chen, X.Q., Chen, S.L. (2003). Impacts and countermeasures of the South-To-North Water Diversion Projects on the ecological environment of Changjiang Estuary. In: Chen, J.Y. (Ed.), Impacts and Countermeasures of the South-To-North Water Diversion Projects on the Ecological Environment of Changjiang Estuary. Publication of ECNU, Shanghai, pp. 1–12.
  17. Hsu, L., Dietrich, W. E., and Sklar, L. S. (2008). “Experimental study of bedrock erosion by granular flows”. J. Geophys. Res., Earth Surface (2003–2012), 113(F2).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.