Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 58, 2016
The 3rd Bali International Seminar on Science & Technology (BISSTECH 2015)
Article Number 03009
Number of page(s) 6
Section Information Technology and Information Systems
Published online 23 May 2016
  1. Brynjolfsson, Erik. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM. Volume 36 (12), page 66–77. [CrossRef]
  2. Chan, Y.E., Huff, S.L., Barclay, D.W. and Copeland, D.G. (1997). Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment, Information Systems Research 8(2): 125–150. [CrossRef]
  3. Chan. Y.E, Reich. B.H, (2007). IT alignment: what have we learned?. Journal of Information Technology. No. 22, pp. 297–315. [CrossRef]
  4. Henderson, J.C. and Sifonis, J.G. (1988). The Value of Strategic IS Planning: Understanding consistency, validity, and IS markets, MIS Quarterly 12(2): 187–200. [CrossRef]
  5. Henderson. J. dan Venkatraman. N. (1992). Strategic Alignment: A model for organizational transformation through information technology. T. Kochan & M. Unseem, eds, Transforming Organizations, Oxford University Press, NY.
  6. Indrajit, Richardus Eko. 2006. Maturity Level Measuring Utilization of Information Technology for Educational Institutions an Approach Readiness Stakeholders. EII Journal: 116-120.
  7. Information Systems Audit and Control Association. IS Standards, Guidelines and Procedures for Auditing and Control Professionals, ISACA, 2007.
  8. Irani, Z. (2002). Information Systems Evaluation: Navigating through the problem domain, Information Management 40(1): 11–24. [CrossRef]
  9. ITGI. 2007. COBIT 4.1: Control Objective, Management Guidelines, Maturity Models. United States of America: IT Governance Institute.
  10. Kearns, G.S. and Lederer, A.L. (2003). A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage, Decision Sciences 34(1): 1–29. [CrossRef]
  11. McLean, E.R. and Soden, J.V. (1977). Strategic Planning for MIS, New York: Wiley.
  12. Mukaromah, Siti. 2010. Information Systems Auditing Academic Information System Using Standards COBIT 4.0 Domain Acquire and Implement (Case Study on Stikomp Surabaya). Stikom Digital Library: Surabaya.
  13. Mukaromah, S., & Subriadi, A.P. 2015. The Significant of Cobit Mapping Business Goal 12 and IT Goal 19 (Case Study: Stikom Surabaya). ISST 2015.
  14. Revinggar, B. N., Tanuwijaya, H., & Mastan, I. A. (2012). Audit Information System Outpatient Installation Based on Customer Perspective Balanced Scorecard and COBIT 4.1 Standard (Case Study: General Hospital Haji Surabaya). Jurnal JSIKA, 1(1).
  15. Sarno, R. 2009. Business Success Strategy with Information Technology, Based Balanced Scorecard & CobiT. Surabaya: ITS Press.
  16. Subriadi A.P., Hadiwidjojo D., Djumahir, Rahayu M., Sarno R. 2013. Information Technology Productivity Paradox: A Resource-Based View and Information Technology Strategic Alignment Perspective For Measuring Information Technology Contribution On Performance. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. Vol. 54 No.3 (541-552).
  17. Tanuwijaya H, Sarno R. Comparation of CobiT Maturity Model and Structural Equation Model for Measuring the Alignment between University Academic Regulations and Information Technology Goals. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 10 (2010) 80-92.
  18. Tenenhaus, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling for small samples. Working paper no 885.
  19. Wijayanto, S. H. (2008). Structure Equation Modelling, Consep and Tutorial with Lisrel 8.80. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.