Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 52, 2016
2016 International Conference on Design Engineering and Science (ICDES 2016)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Chapter 3: Innovation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20165203002
Published online 11 April 2016
  1. S. Z. Abidin, D. Christoforidou, and A. Liem. Thinking And Re-Thinking Verbal Protocol Analysis In Design Research. Stanford: International Conference On Engineering Design, pp.1–12(Aug. 2009). [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Anwar, S. Z. Abidin, and O. H. Hassan. A Framework of Empirical Study Through Design Practice for Industrial Ceramic Sanitary Ware Design. In ICADER 2014 by O. H. Hassan, S. Z. Abidin, R. Legino, R. Anwar and M. F. Kamaruzaman (eds). Singapore: Springer (2015). [Google Scholar]
  3. R. C. Valkenburg, Shared understanding as a condition for team design”. Automation in Construction, vol. 7 (2), pp.111–121 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Sener, and P. Wormald. User evaluation of HCI concepts for defining product form. Design Studies, vol. 29 (1), pp. 12–29(2007). [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Pahl, and W Beitz. Engineering design. London: The Design Council and Springer Verlag(1984). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Pugh, D. Clausing, and R. Andrade. Creating innovative products using total design. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing (1996). [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Anwar, S. Z. Abidin, and O. H. Hassan. Function Means Analysis For Ablution Concept Solution. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, pp. 224–231(2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Cross. Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (2000). [Google Scholar]
  9. L. B. Archer. Systematic Method for Designers. In Developments in Design Methodology, by Nigel Cross (eds). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons(1984). [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Pugh. Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering. Boston: Addison-Wesley(1991). [Google Scholar]
  11. L. B. Archer. A View of the Nature of the Design Research. In Design: Science: Method, by R. Jacques and J. A. Powell, Guilford, Surrey: IPC Business Press Ltd., pp. 30–47 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Frayling. Research in art and design. vol. 1 (1), London: Royal College of Art Research Papers(1993). [Google Scholar]
  13. C. L. Owen. Design research, building the knowledge base. Design Processes Newsletter 5 no. 6, pp. 1–6(1994). [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Bayazit. Investigating Design: Review of Forty Years of Design Research. Design Issues 20 (1), pp. 16–29(2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Z. Abidin, J. Sigurjonsson, A. Liem, and M. Keitsch. On the Role of Formgiving in Design. International Conference On Engineering & Product Design Education. Barcelona, pp. 365–370 (Sept. 2008). [Google Scholar]
  16. N. Cila, P. Hekkert, and V. Visch. Source Selection in Product Metaphor Generation: The Effects of Salience and Relatedness. International Journal of Design, vol. 1 (2), pp. 15–28(2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. R. L. Marsh, T. B. Ward, and J. D. Land. The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task. Memory & Cognition. vol 27 (1), pp. 94–105(1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Z. Abidin, H. V. Bjelland, and T. A. Øritsland. The embodied mind in relation to thinking about form development. Proceedings of NordDesign 2008 Conference. Tallin: pp. 265–274, Aug. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Lakoff and M. Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Book, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Dorst. The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and Its Application. Design Studies. vol. 32 (6), pp. 521–532(2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. H. P. Casakin. Factors of metaphors in design problem-solving: Implications for design creativity. International Journal of Design. vol. 1 (2), pp. 21–33(2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Pahl, W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen, and K. Grote. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. 3rd. Edited by K.Wallace and L. T. M. Blessing. London: Springer-Verlag(2007). [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Anwar, S. Z. Abidin, and O. H. Hassan. Pattern in Formgiving Design: Giving Priority to a Principle Solution in Industrial Design Situation. In Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications 2015, by M. Gen, K. J. Kim, X. Huang and Y. Hiroshi, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 331–340(2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. N. Cross. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag(2006). [Google Scholar]
  25. V. Hubka, M. M. Andreasen, and W. E. Eder. Practical Studies in Systematic Design. Edited by Peter Hills. London: Butterworths(1988). [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Tjalve. Systematic Design of Industrial Product. Lyngby: Institute for Product Development(2003). [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Z. Abidin. Practice-based design thinking for form development and detailing. PhD Thesis Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  28. L. T. M. Blessing. A process-based approach to computer-supported engineering design. PhD thesis. Twente: University of Twente, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Anwar, S. Z. Abidin, and O. H. Hassan. Understanding Methodological Solution In Design Situation Of Novice Designer. 18th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, Florence, IEEE. pp. 593–597 (Sept. 2015). [Google Scholar]
  30. R. Anwar, S. Z. Abidin, and O. H. Hassan. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, pp. 13–21(2015). [Google Scholar]
  31. N. H. Johari, R. Anwar, and O. H. Hassan. “Design framework of ceramic ablution Tub”. IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications, Bandung, IEEE, pp. 608–610(2012). [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Z. Abidin, A. Warell, and A. Liem. Understanding Styling Activity Of Automotive Designers: A Study Of Manual Interpolative Morphing Through Freehand Sketching. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED11). Copenhagen: Design Society, pp. 357–366(Aug. 2011). [Google Scholar]
  33. W. Muller. Order and Meaning in Design. Utrecth: Lemma Publisher(2001). [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Warell. Design Syntactics: A Functional Approach to Visual Product Form. Goteborg: Chalmers University of Technology(2001). [Google Scholar]
  35. R. Mono. Design for Product Understanding: The Aesthetics of Design from a Semiotic Approach. Stockholm: Liber AB(1997). [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Liem. Managing The Industrial Design Process: A Guide for Studio Practice. Singapore: Prentice Hall(2004). [Google Scholar]
  37. K.T. Ulrich and S.D. Eppinger. Product Design and Development, 5th, New Delhi: TATA McGraw-Hill Edition(2005). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.