Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 51, 2016
2016 International Conference on Mechanical, Manufacturing, Modeling and Mechatronics (IC4M 2016)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Chapter 3: Experimental and Empirical Studies in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20165103003 | |
| Published online | 06 April 2016 | |
- Muthukrishnan, N., Murugan, M., & Prahladarao, K. (2008). Machinability issues in turning of Al–SiC (10p) metal matrix composites. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 39, 2008, pp 211–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Manna, A., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2003). A study on machinability of Al/SiC–MMC. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 140, No.1, pp 711–716. [Google Scholar]
- Ozben, T., Kilickap, E., & Çakır, O. (2008). Investigation of mechanical and machinability properties of SiC particle reinforced Al–MMC. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 198, 220–225. [Google Scholar]
- Daniel, B. S. S., Murthy, V. S. R., & Murty, G. S. (1997). Metal-ceramic composites via in situ methods. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 68, 132–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Demir, H., & Gunduz, S. (2009). The effects of aging on machinability of 6061 aluminum alloy. Materials & Design, 30, 1480–1483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Guo, D., Zhang, M., Jin, Z., & Kang, R. (2006). Pulse plating of copper-ZrB2 composite coatings. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 22, 514–518 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Naveenkumar, G., Narayanasamy, R., Natarajan, S., Kumareshbabu, S. P., Sivaprasad, K., & Sivasankaran, K. (2010). Dry sliding wear behavior of AA 6351-ZrB2 in situ composite at room temperature. Materials & Design, 31, 1526–1532. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ozcatalbas, Y. (2003a). Chip and built-up edge formation in the machining of in situ Al4C3–Al composite. Materials & Design, 24, 215–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Anandakrishnan, A., & Mahamani, A. (2010). Investigations of flank wear, cutting force, and surface roughness in the machining of Al-6061–TiB2 in situ metal matrix composites produced by flux-assisted synthesis. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 55(1-4), 65–73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Doniavi, A., Eskandarzade, M., Abdi, A., & Totonchi, A. (2008). Empirical modeling of EDM parameters using Grey relational analysis. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 1, 502–509. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ganeshbabu, B., Selladurai, V., & Shanmugam, R. (2008). Analytical modeling of cutting forces of end milling operation on aluminum silicon carbide particulate metal matrix composite material using response surface methodology. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3, 5–18. [Google Scholar]
- Haq, A. N., Marimuthu, P., & Jeyapaul, R. (2008). Multi response optimization of machining parameters of drilling Al/SiC metal matrix composite using grey relational analysis in the Taguchi method. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37, 250–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Huang, J. T., & Liao, Y. S. (2003). Optimization of machining parameters of Wire-EDM based on Grey relational and statistical analyses. International Journal of Production Research, 41, 1707–1720. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, S., Subramaniyasarma, V., & Murty, B. S. (2007). Influence of in-situ formed TiB2 particles on the abrasive wear behavior of Al-4Cu alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A, 465, 160–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lu, L., Lai, M. O., & Chen, F. L. (1997). Al-4% Cu composite reinforced with in-situ TiB2 particles. Acta Materialia, 45, 4297–4309. doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00075-X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.