EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 47 (2016) MATEC Web of Conferences, 47 (2016) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 47, 2016
The 3rd International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering for Sustainability (IConCEES 2015)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Geotechnics, Infrastructure and Geomatic Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20164703002
Published online 01 April 2016
  1. S. Mc. Inally, A model for motorcycle rider skill development, L. Dorn (Ed), Driver Behavior and Trainning, Ashgate Publishing, Cranfield University, 35-43, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  2. M.M.A. Manan and A. Vrhelyi, Motorcycle fatalities in Malaysia, IATSS Research, 36, 30-39, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M.A. Akaateba, A.R. Gyimah and I. Yakubu, A cross-sectional observational study of helmet use among motorcyclists in Wa. Ghana, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 64, 18-22, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Ambak, A. Riza Atiq and I. Rozmi, Intelligent transport system for motorcycle safety and issues, European J. of Scientific Research, 28 (4), 600-611, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  5. Polis Diraja Malaysia, Laporan Perangkaan Malaysia 2010, Malaysia, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  6. T.Y. Pang, R.S. Radin Umar, A.A. Azhar, M.T. Mohd Nasir and H.H Hamdan, Injury characteristic of motorcyclist by Abbreaviated Injury Scale (AIS), Research Report 2/2000, National Road Safety Council Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, (2000). [Google Scholar]
  7. F.A.O. Fernandez and R.J. Alves De Sousa, Motorcycle helmets- A state of the art review, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 56, 1-21, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T.R. Jaafar, M.F. Mustafa, S. kemin and R. Kasiran, Kemalangan jalan raya: Analisis data membabitkan pengguna motosikal, Jurnal Teknologi, 38(B), 1-14, (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S.P. Baker, B. O’Neill, M.J. Ginsburg and L. Guohua, The Injury Fact Book, Oxford University Press, New York, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  10. F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340, (1989). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Ambak, R. Ismail, R.A. Abdullah, A.A. Latif and M.E. Sanik, Application of technology acceptance model in predicting behavioral intention to use safety helmetreminder system, Research J. of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(3), 881-888, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. R.H. Shroff, C.C. Deneen and E.M.W. Ng, Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students’ behavioral intention to use an e-portfolio sytem. Autralasian, J. of Education Technology, 27(4), 600-618, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Osswald, D. Wurhofer and S. Trosterer, Predicting information technology usage in the car: Towards a car technology aceptance model, Automotive U1’12, Portsmouth, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Weston and P.A. Jr. Gore, A brief guide to structural equation modelling, Couns. Psychol, 34(5), 719-751, (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Ambak, R. Ismail, R.A. Abdullah, M.N. Borhan, Using structural equation modelling and the behavioral sciences theories in predicting helmet use, Proceeding Of the Int. Conference on Andvances Sciences, Engineering and Information Technology, Putrajaya, 639-645, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Ambak, N. Rosli, B.D. Daniel and J. Prasetijo, Behavioral intention to use safety helmet reminder system using the extended technology acceptance model, The 3rd Annual Int. Conference on Architecture and Civil Engineering, Singapore, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. P. Chua, Kaedah dan Statistik, Uian Regresi, Analisis Faktor dan Analisis SEM, McGraw Hill, Malaysia, (2014). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.