Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 44, 2016
2016 International Conference on Electronic, Information and Computer Engineering
Article Number 01057
Number of page(s) 5
Section Computer, Algorithm, Control and Application Engineering
Published online 08 March 2016
  1. R. Marquardt and A. Lesnicar, “New Concept for High Voltage—Modular Multilevel Converter”, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Aachen, Germany, (2004) June 25–26. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Hagiwara, K. Nishimura and H. Akagi, “A Medium-voltage Motor Drive with a Modular Multilevel PWM Inverter”, IEEE Trans on Industrial Electronics, vol. 25, no. 7, (2010), pp. 1786–1799. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Dorn, H. Huang and D. Retzmann, “A New Multilevel Voltage-sourced Converter Topology for HVDC Applications”, CIGRE Session: International Council on Large Electric Systems, Paris, France (2008). [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Y. Zhao, T. Li, L. J. Yu, Y. Huang, L. F. Li and X. L. Li, “DC Pole-to-ground Fault Characteristic Analysis and Converter Fault Recovery Strategy of MMC-HVDC”, Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 34, no. 21, (2014), pp. 3518–3526. [Google Scholar]
  5. X. N. Zhang, C. Y. Zhao and H. Pang. “A Control and Protection Scheme of Multi-terminal DC Transmission System Based on M MC for DC Line Fault”, Automation of Electric Power System, vol. 37, no. 15, (2013), pp. 140–145. [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Y. Zhao, X. F. Chen, C. G. Cao and H. B. Jing, “Control and Protection Strategies for MMC-HVDC under Faults”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 23, (2011), pp. 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. S. Wang, X. X. Zhou, G. F. Tang, Z. Y. He, L. T. Teng and H. L. Bao, “Analysis of Submodule Overcurrent Caused by DC Pole-to-pole Fault in Modular Multilevel Converter HVDC System”, Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 31, no. 1, (2011), pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Tang, Z. Xu and Y. Z. Zhou, “Impacts of Three MMC-HVDC Configurations on AC System Stability Under DC Line Faults”, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, vol. 29, no. 6, (2014), pp. 3030–3040. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Tang and Z. Xu, “A LCC and M MC Hybrid HVDC Topology with DC Line Fault Clearance Capability”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, vol. 62, no. 11, (2014), pp. 419–428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. P. F. Hu, D. Z. Jiang, Y. B. Zhou, Z. Y. Lin, Y. Q. Liang and J. Guo, “Redundancy Fault-tolerated Control Strategy for Sub-module Faults of Modular Multilevel Converters”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 37, no. 15, (2013), pp. 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  11. L. G. Franquelo, J. Rodriguez, J. I. Leon, S. Kouro and R. Portillo, “The Age of Multi-level Converters Arrives”, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, vol. 2, no. 2, (2008), pp. 28–39. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Dom, H. Huang and D. Retzmann, “Novel Voltage Source Converters for HVDC and FACTS Applications”, CIGRE International Symposium Conference, Osaka, Japan, (2007) pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Y. Guan and Z. Xu, “Redundancy Protection for Sub-module Faults in Modular Multilevel Converter”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 16, (2011), pp. 94–99. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Y. Guan and Z. Xu, “Modeling and Control of Modular Multilevel Converter-based HVDC Systems under Unbalanced Grid Conditions”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 12, (2012), pp. 4858–4867. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Y. Guan, Z. Xu, Q. R. Tu and W. Y. Pan, “Nearest Level Modulation for Modular Multilevel Converters in HVDC Transmission”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 34, no. 2, (2010), pp. 48–52. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Y. Guan, Z. Xu, “Optimized Capacitor Voltage Balancing Control for Modular Multilevel Converter Based VSC-HVDC System”, Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 31, no. 12, (2011), pp. 9–14. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.