Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 42, 2016
2015 The 3rd International Conference on Control, Mechatronics and Automation (ICCMA 2015)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 5
Section Automation control theory and Applications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20164201008
Published online 17 February 2016
  1. B.L. Nguyen, J.L. Merino, and E.S. Gang: Remote Navigation for Ablation Procedures -A New Step Forward in the Treatment of Cardiac Arrhythmias (2010).
  2. W. Saliba, V.Y. Reddy, O. Wazni, J.E. Cummings, J.D. Burkhardt, M. Haissaguerre, J. Kautzner, P. Peichl, P. Neuzil, and V. Schibgilla: Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system: initial human experience and long-term follow-up results. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 51, 25 (2008), pp. 2407–2411. [CrossRef]
  3. Y. Fu, H. Liu, W. Huang, S. Wang, and Z. Liang: Steerable catheters in minimally invasive vascular surgery. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 5, 4 (2009), pp. 381–391. [CrossRef]
  4. M.P. Armacost, J. Adair, T. Munger, R.R. Viswanathan, F.M. Creighton, D.T. Curd, and R. Sehra: Accurate and reproducible target navigation with the stereotaxis Niobe® magnetic navigation system. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 18 (s1) (2007), pp. S26–S31. [CrossRef]
  5. E.M. Khan, W. Frumkin, G.A. Ng, S. Neelagaru, F.M. Abi-Samra, J. Lee, M. Giudici, D. Gohn, R.A. Winkle, and J. Sussman: First experience with a novel robotic remote catheter system: Amigo™ mapping trial. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 37, 2 (2013), pp. 121–129. [CrossRef]
  6. H. Mochiyama: Hyper-flexible robotic manipulators. EEE International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science (2005), pp.41–46.M.
  7. H. Mochiyama, and T. Suzuki: Kinematics and dynamics of a cable-like hyper-flexible manipulator. In proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 3 (2003), pp. 3672–3677.
  8. M. Ivanescu, and V. Stoian: A variable structure controller for a tentacle manipulator. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3 (1995), pp. 3155–3160.
  9. M. Ivanescu: Position dynamic control for a tentacle manipulator. In proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2 (2002), pp. 1531–1538.
  10. M. Ivanescu, N. Popescu, and D. Popescu: A variable length tentacle manipulator control system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2 (2005), pp. 1531–1538.
  11. E. Tatlicioglu, I.D. Walker, and D.M. Dawson: Dynamic modelling for planar extensible continuum robot manipulators. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2007), pp. 1357–1362.
  12. E. Tatlicioglu, I.D. Walker, and D.M. Dawson: New dynamic models for planar extensible continuum robot manipulators. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2007), pp. 1485–1490.
  13. D. Trivedi, A. Lotfi, and C.D. Rahn: Geometrically exact dynamic models for soft robotic manipulators. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2007), pp. 1497–1502.
  14. D.B. Camarillo, C.F. Milne, C.R. Carlson, M.R. Zinn, and J.K. Salisbury: Mechanics modeling of tendon-driven continuum manipulators. Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, 24, 6 (2008), pp. 1262–1273. [CrossRef]
  15. M. Khoshnam, M. Azizian, and R.V. Patel: Modeling of a steerable catheter based on beam theory. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2012), pp. 4681–4686.
  16. R.J. Webster, and B.A. Jones: Design and kinematic modeling of constant curvature continuum robots: A review. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 29 (2010), pp. 1661–1683. [CrossRef]
  17. T. Mahl, A.E. Mayer, A. Hildebrandt, and O. Sawodny: A variable curvature modeling approach for kinematic control of continuum manipulators. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC), Washington, DC (2013), pp. 4945–4950.
  18. B.A. Jones, R.L. Gray, and K. Turlapati: Three dimensional statics for continuum robotic. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), St. Louis, MO (2009), pp. 2659–2664.
  19. D. Trivedi, A. Lotfi, and , C.D. Rahn: Geometrically exact models for soft robotic manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24, 4 (2008), pp. 773–780. [CrossRef]
  20. A. Kapoor, N. Simaan, and R.H. Taylor: Suturing in confined spaces: constrained motion control of a hybrid 8-DoF robot. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Robotics (2005), pp. 452–459.
  21. D.B. Camarillo, C.R. Carlson, and J.K. Salisbury: Configuration tracking for continuum manipulators with coupled tendon drive. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 25, 4 (2009), pp. 798–808. [CrossRef]
  22. M. Dehghani, and S. A. A. Moosavian: Modeling and control of a planar continuum robot. In Proceedings of IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) (2011), pp. 66–971.
  23. A.D. Kapadia, I.D. Walker, D.M. Dawson: A model-based sliding mode controller for extensible continuum robots. In Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS international conference on Signal processing, robotics and automation. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS) (2010), pp. 113–120.
  24. Y. Ganji, and F. Janabi-Sharifi: Kinematic characterization of a cardiac ablation catheter. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2007), pp. 1876–1881.
  25. S.B. Kesner, and R. D. Howe: Force control of flexible catheter robots for beating heart surgery. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2011), pp. 1589–1594.
  26. M. H. Beers, A. Fletcher, T. Jones, R. Porter, M. Berkwitz, and J. Kaplan, The Merck Manual of Med. Inf., Merck Research Laboratories, (2003).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.