Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 1, 2012
CSNDD 2012 – International Conference on Structural Nonlinear Dynamics and Diagnosis
Article Number 10008
Number of page(s) 4
Section Nonlinear Dynamics of Systems
Published online 09 July 2012
  1. Casagrande A. Liquefaction and cyclic deformation of sands - a critical review. In S.A.G. (Ed.), Fifth Panamerican Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (pp. 79–133). Buenos Aires, Argentina: S.A.G., 1975 [Google Scholar]
  2. Seed B., Idriss I.M. Ground Motions and Soils Liquefaction During Earthquakes. Technical report, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  3. Juang C.H., Yuan H., Lee D.H., Lin P.S. Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 129(1), 66–80, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dobry R., Soil properties and earthquake ground response, Volume 4, Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1171–1187, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  5. Park K., Kim S., Lee J., and Park I. Energy-based evaluation of excess pore pressure using damage potential. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mitchell J.K. and Tseng D.J. Assessment of liquefaction potential by cone penetration resistance. Proc., H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symposium. Vol. 2. BiTech Pub., Richmond, British Columbia, May, pp. 335–350, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee M., Finn W. DESRA - Program for the Dynamic Effective Stress Response Analysis of Soil Deposites, Including Liquefaction Evaluation. Technical Report 36, Soil Mechanics Series. Departament of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  8. Siddharthan R., Finn W. TARA2 - Two Dimensional Nonlinear, Static and Dynamic Response Analysis. Technical Report 74, Soil dynamics Group, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  9. Arulanandan K., Muraleetharan K., Yogachandran C. Seismic response of soil deposits in San Fransisco marina distric. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 123, No 10, 965–974, 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hashash Y.M.A, Groholski D.R., Phillips C. A., Park D. DEEPSOIL V3.7beta, User Manual and Tutorial. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA, 88 p, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Matasovic N. and Vucetic M. Cyclic Characterization of Liquefiable Sands. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 119(11):1805–1822, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen C.J., Juang C.H. Calibration of SPT- and CPT-based liquefaction evaluation methods. In: Mayne P., Hryciw R. (Eds.), Innovations Applications in Geotechnical Site Characterization. Geotechnical Special Publication, vol. 97. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp. 49–64, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  13. Iwasaki T., Arakawa T., Tokida K. Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes. In Proceedings of the Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Southampton, UK, Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. pp. 925–939, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  14. Juang C.H., Ou C.Y., Lu C.C., Luo Z. Probabilistic framework for assessing liquefaction hazard at a given site in a specified exposure time using standard penetration testing. Can. Geotech. J. 47: 674–687, 2010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Touil N., Khamlichi A., Jabbouri A., Bezzazi M. Adaptation d’approches en vue d’évaluer le potentiel de liquéfaction des sols de Tanger. CFM’2009, Marseille, France, 2009. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.