Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 409, 2025
Concrete Solutions 2025 – 9th International Conference on Concrete Repair, Durability & Technology
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04003 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Case Studies 1 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202540904003 | |
Published online | 13 June 2025 |
Unexpected effects on the corrosion behaviour of a local concrete repair in a marine environment
1 CITec GmbH, Dresden, Germany
2 DB Engineering & Consulting GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany
3 ZIE Zentrum für Infrastrukturerhaltung, Hamburg, Germany
* Corresponding author: ulrich.schneck@citec-online.com
The case study is about the repair of a bridge column in the Baltic Sea which had been constructed with low concrete cover in some areas and also exhibited signs of ASR. Therefore, a repair mortar had been chosen which is designed for use both on structures suffering ASR and a marine environment. During a test repair on one of the damage-/breakout areas the possibility of incipient anode formation had to be in mind, because the original concrete had a generally increased chloride content. Initial potential surveys on and around the repair spot ca. 3 weeks after the concrete placement/ spraying showed no changes in the original concrete close to the repair area, and the potential values in the repair area were about 200 mV more positive. Enhanced corrosion measurements resulted in a sound passive behaviour of the rebar in the original concrete. Very unexpectedly, the reinforcement embedded in the repair mortar was in an active state at low polarisation and electrolyte resistances – despite the more positive potentials, which dropped by ca. 100 mV after a minute of wetting the surface. Dust samples of the repair mortar were analysed for pH value, which were about 12.3 and possibly not sufficiently basic to establish passivity on the reinforcement which had a slight, covering layer of corrosion products from the recent air exposure over the whole area. It was agreed to thoroughly clean the rebar in other repair spots before spraying the repair mortar there and to watch for the corrosion behaviour on all repair spots. Apparently, the passivation of the reinforcement in the repaired areas is retarded at the observed low pH values and can take several week or months. This seems to be beneficial for avoiding the formation of incipient anodes around the repair area. At the time of writing the manuscript final measurements to prove this are scheduled.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.