Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 408, 2025
44th Conference of the International Deep Drawing Research Group (IDDRG 2025)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01093 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Full Papers | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202540801093 | |
Published online | 07 May 2025 |
On the equivalence and differences of three plane-stress yield criteria for modelling orthotropic sheet metals with the tension-compression strength differential effect
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Methodist University,
Dallas, Texas, USA
* Corresponding author: wtong@smu.edu
The plane-stress yield surface of a sheet metal exhibiting tension-compression asymmetry may be modelled by a single polynomial yield stress function consisting of both even and odd order stress terms. The simplest such polynomial yield stress function would be the one made of quadratic and linear polynomials of stresses. Historically, Hill's 1948 homogeneous quadratic polynomial yield stress function with kinematic hardening is a more widely used formulation. Recently, a yield stress function consisting of a square root of Hill's 1948 homogeneous quadratic polynomial plus a linear polynomial also appears in the literature. This theoretical study examines their equivalence and differences. As the set of six material constants in each formulation is non-linearly but uniquely related, the equivalence of their yield conditions was established directly per the imposed strict positivity and convexity conditions. Differences in their associated flow rules and equivalent plastic stress-strain relationships were pointed out for the first time. Possible generalizations of these three formulations to non-quadratic polynomial ones with some challenges were discussed at the end.
Key words: Anisotropic plasticity / Quadratic yield criteria / Convexity and positivity / Non-homogeneous polynomial
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.