Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 169, 2018
The Sixth International Multi-Conference on Engineering and Technology Innovation 2017 (IMETI 2017)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01031 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816901031 | |
Published online | 25 May 2018 |
Optimum distance for voice navigation in walking support system for visually impaired
1
Information Networking Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, Seikei University, 180-8633 Tokyo, Japan
2
Information Networking Laboratory, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Seikei University, 180-8633 Tokyo, Japan
3
Graduate School of Design and Architecture, Nagoya City University, 464-0083 Nagoya, Japan
a Corresponding author: oguchi@st.seikei.ac.jp
Voice navigation with information and communication technologies allows the visually impaired (VI) to grasp the current situation promptly. While instruction prior to the action e.g. turning a corner, seems to be effective, the optimum lead distance remains unclear. This paper verifies experimentally the optimum lead distance to support VI while walking. In the experiment, each subject (normal vision) walked while wearing an eye mask to simulate VI, holding a white cane, and received voice guidance. After each trial, the subject scored the lead distance in terms of acceptability. 28 young healthy males/females participated. Results showed the highest score was for 3 m while the lowest was for 5 m. Distance range with score over 3 (average) was 2 to 4 m. No clear significant difference was observed in terms of subject height. As walking speed was around 0.55 m/s, 1 m was deemed insufficient. 5 m or more seemed to be too long as subjects failed to predict accurately how far they had moved. This experiment verified that VI voice navigation turn instructions are effective if given more than 1m and less than 4 m before the turning point.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2018
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.