| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2018
12th International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 16008 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Multi-Axial, Variable and Complex Loadings | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816516008 | |
| Published online | 25 May 2018 | |
Performance of chosen multiaxial cycle counting method under non-proportional multiaxial variable loading.
Slovak University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Namestie Slobody 17, 812 31 Bratislava, Slovakia
* Corresponding author: matus.margetin@stuba.sk
One of the most crucial tasks in fatigue life-time estimation of components loaded with multiaxial variable amplitude loading is to correctly identify loading cycles that can be used with multiaxial damage criterions. During past years, several cycle counting methods have been proposed for multiaxial loading conditions. The aim of this text is the comparison of selected multiaxial cycle counting methods, namely Wang-Brown’s method, Modified Wang-Brown’s method, Bannantine-Socie’s method and then a critical analysis of the obtained results. For the comparison of chosen methods, a new data set, consisting of experimentally obtained results from multiaxial non-proportional variable amplitude loading tests carried on by authors, has been used. The tested specimens were made from S355J0 structural steel and the testing procedure has been carried out on the MTS Axial/Torsion servo hydraulic testing machine. Findley and McDiarmid multiaxial criterion with Palgren-Miner summation rule have been used for fatigue life-time estimation of the tested specimens.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2018
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.