| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 101, 2017
Sriwijaya International Conference on Engineering, Science and Technology (SICEST 2016)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 05019 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Green Constructions | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710105019 | |
| Published online | 09 March 2017 | |
Accuracy analysis of SRTM usage for upper Citarum River flood modeling
Civil Engineering Department, Sumatera Utara University, 20155 Medan, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: rizawaloed@yahoo.com
Natural channel cross section is generally very irregular and varied, for complex cross-sections and natural cross sections no specific formula presents to express the elements of the geometric cross section of the channel. The study uses HEC-Geo RAS with Arc GIS 10 and HEC-RAS 4.1.0 for modeling and 1D hydrodynamic. The surveyed cross sections modeling is calibrated and validated with observed daily discharge. Then the surveyed data cross sections are replaced by the cross sections extracted from SRTM. Accuracy is suitability between the surveyed data cross sections with data cross sections which extracted from SRTM. Accuracy is expressed by the magnitude of the error. The ratio of simulated discharges between two models by surveyed data cross sections and SRTM data cross sections have index of performance indicator for Nash–Sutcliffe Index (NI) is 0.95 and index of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is 0.41. Index of Performance indicator for comparison of simulated discharges between models with Nash–Sutcliffe Index (NI) is 0.95 and index of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is 0.41. The results show that cross sections from SRTM can be an alternative to extract data cross sections for Upper Citarum River flood modeling.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.