Issue |
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 1, 2012
CSNDD 2012 – International Conference on Structural Nonlinear Dynamics and Diagnosis
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01003 | |
Number of page(s) | 3 | |
Section | Structural Health Monitoring | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20120101003 | |
Published online | 09 July 2012 |
On assessing the robustness of an input signal optimization algorithm for damage detection: the Info-Gap Decision Theory approach
1 Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy
2 Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, 87545 Los Alamos, NM, USA
a e-mail: michele.pasquali@uniroma1.it
The Info-Gap Decision Theory (IGDT) is here adopted to assess the robust- ness of a technique aimed at identifying the optimal excitation signal within a structural health monitoring (SHM) procedure. Given limited system response measurements and ever-present physical limits on the level of excitation, the ultimate goal of the mentioned technique is to improve the detectability of the damage increasing the difference between measurable outputs of the undamaged and damaged system. In particular, a 2 DOF mass-spring-damper system characterized by the presence of a nonlinear stiffness is considered. Uncertainty is introduced within the system under the form of deviations of its parameters (mass, stiffness, damping ratio…) from their nominal values. Variations in the performance of the mentioned technique are then evaluated both in terms of changes in the estimated difference between the responses of the damaged and undamaged system and in terms of deviations of the identified optimal input signal from its nominal estimation. Finally, plots of the performances of the analyzed algorithm for different levels of uncertainty are obtained, showing which parameters are more sensitive to the presence of uncertainty and thus enabling a clear evaluation of its robustness.
© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2012
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.