Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 419, 2026
International Conference on Mechanical and Materials Engineering (ICMME 2025)
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202641901014
Published online 18 March 2026
  1. R. Vasavada, et al., Overview of the Mars Science Laboratory mission: Curiosity rover. Space Sci. Rev. 170, 21–62 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-012-9911-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. S. W. Squyres, et al., The Spirit rover’s Athena science investigation at Gusev crater, Mars. Science 305, 794–799 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3050794 [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Verma, et al., Autonomous robotics is driving Perseverance rover’s progress on Mars. Sci. Robot. 8, eadi3099 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.adi3099 [Google Scholar]
  4. K. A. Farley, et al., Mars 2020 mission overview. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00762-y [Google Scholar]
  5. J. L. Vago, et al., Habitability on early Mars and the search for biosignatures with the ExoMars rover. Astrobiology 17, 471–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2016.1533 [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Tian, et al., Zhurong: Features and mission of China’s first Mars rover. Innovation 2, 100177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100177 [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Wertz, D. Everett, J. Puschell, Space mission engineering: The new SMAD. Microcosm Press (2011) [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Cheng, Y. Xu, W. Zhou, Nozzle flow simulation by small disturbance approximation and Euler method. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2012, 012038 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2012/1/012038 [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Antol, et al., Low-cost Mars surface exploration: The tumbleweed rover concept. NASA Tech. Rep. / AIAA (2006) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. J. Coates, et al., The PanCam instrument for the ExoMars rover. Astrobiology 17, 511–541 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2016.1548 [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Poulakis, et al., 3DROV: A planetary rover system design, simulation and verification tool, in i-SAIRAS (2008) [Google Scholar]
  12. G. A. Landis, S. R. Oleson, D. Grantier, Zephyr: A landsailing rover concept for Venus surface exploration. Acta Astronaut. 69, 511–520 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Vasavada, Mission overview and scientific contributions from the Curiosity rover after eight years of operations. Space Sci. Rev. 218, 14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00877-y [Google Scholar]
  14. M. V. Khade, et al., Design and development of a rocker-bogie mechanism robot with integrated environmental sensors. Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch. 12, 1768–1778 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  15. Cosenza, et al., Theoretical study on a modified rocker-bogie suspension for robotic rovers. Robotica 41, 2915–2940 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574722001536 [Google Scholar]
  16. H. S. Ruhela, S. Bhardwaj, T. Agrawal, P. Gupta, Explicit dynamics analysis of shin pads using finite element analysis, in Int. Conf. Industrial Problems on Machines and Mechanism (Springer, Singapore, 2022), pp. 683–690 [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Gupta, S. Kumar, Liquid crystal polymers: Thermo-optical-mechanical coupling and actuations, in 2024 1st Int. Conf. Sustainability and Technological Advancements in Engineering Domain (SUSTAINED) (IEEE, 2024), pp. 831–835 [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Raura, A. Warren, J. Thangavelautham, Spherical planetary robot for rugged terrain traversal, in IEEE Aerospace Conf. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. Boretti, Air-powered vehicles: Energy storage and propulsion analysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 181, 124–137 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.071 [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Rout, A. K. Jha, P. Gupta, B. Singh, S. Choudhury, Failure analysis of composite plate under ballistic impact. Mater. Today Proc. 74, 1008–1011 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.385 [Google Scholar]
  21. S. B. Goldberg, M. W. Maimone, L. Matthies, Stereo vision and rover navigation software for planetary exploration, in IEEE Aerospace Conf., Vol. 5 (2002) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.