EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 416 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 416 (2025) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 416, 2025
XXIst International Coal Preparation Congress: “Advancing Sustainable Coal Preparation” (ICPC XXI 2025)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 19
Section New Opportunities and Developments / Waste Reprocessing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541601004
Published online 10 November 2025
  1. Zhou, C. et al. Recent progress and potential challenges in coal upgrading via gravity dry separation technologies. Fuel 305, 121430 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  2. Weinstein, R. & Snoby, R. J. Advances in dry jigging improves coal quality. Min Eng 59, 29-34 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  3. Honaker, R. Q. et al. Upgrading Coal Using a Pneumatic Density-Based Separator. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 28, 51-67 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Moszko, J. C., Iwaszenko, S., Andrej, B. & Janoszek, T. Novel dry sorter for coal processing and coal recovery from mine originating wastes. in XVIII International Coal Preparation Congress (ed. Litvinenko, V.) 1149-1154 (2016). doi: 10.1077/978-3-319-40943-6_180. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stepanenko, A. I. & #x00AB;SEPAIR & #x00BB; pneumatic separation complex for dry coal beneficiation. in XVIII International Coal Preparation Congress 1089-1093 Springer International Publishing, (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40943-6_170. [Google Scholar]
  6. Stanczyk, K. Modelling of Hard Coal Beneficiation Process Utilising Negative Pressure Pneumatic Separator. Energies (Basel) 13, 5174 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  7. Stanczyk, K., Bajerski, A. & Laxczny, M. J. Negative-pressure pneumatic separator: a new solution for hard-coal beneficiation. Int J Coal Sci Technol 8, 103-123 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  8. Rhodes, M. J. Introduction to Particle Technology. Wiley. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  9. Fluidization Engineering. Elsevier, (1991). doi: 10.1016/C2009-0-24190-0. [Google Scholar]
  10. Siemens. Simcenter STAR CCM+ User guide, tutorials, knowledge base and technical support. Simcenter STAR CCM+ https://community.sw.siemens.com/s/question/0D54O000061xpUOSAY/simcenter-starccm-user-guide-tutorials-knowledge-base-and-tech-support (2023). [Google Scholar]
  11. Fernandez, P. Physics models in STAR CCM+ (Parts I-IV). The answer is 27 https://theansweris27.com/physic-models-in-star-ccm-part-i/ (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferziger, J. H., Peric, M. & Street, R. L. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer International Publishing, (2020). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99693-6. [Google Scholar]
  13. Symscape. Steady-State or Unsteady CFD Simulation? https://www.symscape.com/steady-state-or-unsteady-cfd-simulation (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. Hildebrand, N. J., Venkatachari, B. S., Srivastava, V., & Choudhari, M. M. Recent Progress on RANS-Based Transition Model Verification. NASA Langley Research Center, (2023). [Google Scholar]
  15. Raje, P., Parish, E., Hickey, J.-P., Cinnella, P., & Duraisamy, K. Recent Developments and Research Needs in Turbulence Modeling of Hypersonic Flows. arXiv:2412.13985, (2025). [Google Scholar]
  16. Anderson, J. D. Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  17. Wheeler, W. Evaluating linear regression models using RMSE and R2. Medium https://medium.com/wwblog/evaluating-regression-models-using-rmse-and-r%C2%B2-42f77400efee (2021). [Google Scholar]
  18. Wicox, D. C. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. Dcw Industries, Incorporated, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  19. Oberkampf, W. L. & Roy, C. J. Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, (2010). doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511760396. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tsoutsanis, P. et al. Comparison of structured- and unstructured-grid, compressible and incompressible methods using the vortex pairing problem. Compute Methods Appl Mech Eng 293, 207-231 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhou, J., Chen, Y., Li, D., Zhang, Z. & Pan, W. Numerical simulation of aircraft wake vortex evolution and wake encounters based on adaptive mesh method. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 14, 1445-1457 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Jindelt, T., van der Burg, J. W., van der Weide, E. T. & Hoeijmakers, H. W. Numerical Investigation of Vortex Breakdown. in 34th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, (2016). doi:10.2514/6.2016-4174. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mimeau, C. & Mortazavi, I. A Review of Vortex Methods and Their Applications: From Creation to Recent Advances. Fluids 6, 68 (2021). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.