EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 413 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 413 (2025) 08002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 413, 2025
International Conference on Measurement, AI, Quality and Sustainability (MAIQS 2025)
Article Number 08002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Advanced Manufacturing Technologies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541308002
Published online 01 October 2025
  1. A. Guner, P. Bidare, A. Jiménez, S. Dimov, and K. Essa, ‘Nozzle Designs in Powder-Based Direct Laser Deposition: A Review’, Sep. 01, 2022, SpringerOpen. doi:10.1007/s12541-022-00688-1. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. P. Kumar, S. Elangovan, R. Mohanraj, and B. Srihari, ‘Critical review of off-axial nozzle and coaxial nozzle for powder metal deposition’, Mater Today Proc, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 8066–8079, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.037. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Gutjahr, ‘Método para reutilização de pó de aço inoxidável 316L processado por deposição de laser de energia direcionada’, PhD Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. J. Pinkerton and L. Lin, ‘Modelling powder concentration distribution from a coaxial deposition nozzle for laser-based rapid tooling’, J Manuf Sci Eng, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2004. doi:10.1115/1.1643748. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Gutjahr, M. Pereira, J. M. Sá de Sousa, H. S. Ferreira, and A. T. Júnior, ‘Powder degradation as a consequence of laser interaction: A study of SS 316L powder reuse on the laser directed energy deposition process’, J Laser Appl, vol. 36, no. 1, Feb. 2024. doi:10.2351/7.0001093. [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Schopphoven, N. Pirch, S. Mann, R. Poprawe, C. L. Häfner, and J. H. Schleifenbaum, ‘Statistical/numerical model of the powder-gas jet for extreme high-speed laser material deposition’, Coatings, vol. 10, no. 4, Apr. 2020. doi:10.3390/coatings10040416. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Bohlen, T. Seefeld, A. Haghshenas, and R. Groll, ‘Characterization of the powder stream propagation behavior of a discrete coaxial nozzle for laser metal deposition’, J Laser Appl, vol. 34, no. 4, Nov. 2022. doi:10.2351/7.0000775. [Google Scholar]
  8. Z. Jardon, P. Guillaume, J. Ertveldt, M. Hinderdael, and G. Arroud, ‘Offline powder-gas nozzle jet characterization for coaxial laser-based Directed Energy Deposition’, Procedia CIRP, vol. 94, no. 94, pp. 281–287, Sep. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.09.053. [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Baily, ‘In-situ Monitoring of Powder Flow in Directed Energy Deposition Additive Manufacturing’, Master Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  10. L. de Melo, ‘Powder jet particle density distribution analysis and qualification for the laser metal deposition process’, Master Thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2015. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:136054752 [Google Scholar]
  11. TWI Limited, ‘Additive Manufacturing’, Wallis Way, Catcliffe, Rotherham. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.twi-global.com/what-we-do/research-and-technology/technologies/additive-manufacturing [Google Scholar]
  12. Hornet Laser Cladding. Accessed: Feb. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.hornetlasercladding.com/ [Google Scholar]
  13. ABB Ltd. Accessed: Feb. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://new.abb.com/products/robotics [Google Scholar]
  14. BLC Lasercladding GmbH, ‘BLC Powder Hopper’. Accessed: Feb. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://blc-lasercladding.de/PRODUKTELEISTUNGEN/ERSATZTEILE-ZUBEHOeR [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Groarke, C. Danilenkoff, S. Karam, E. McCarthy, B. Michel, A. Mussato, J. Sloane, A. O’Neill, R. Raghavendra, D. Brabazon ‘316l stainless steel powders for additive manufacturing: Relationships of powder rheology, size, size distribution to part properties’, Materials, vol. 13, no. 23, pp. 1–19, Dec. 2020. doi:10.3390/ma13235537. [Google Scholar]
  16. Metalpine, ‘Metalpine spherical powder data sheet’, 2023. Accessed: Feb. 17, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://metalpine.at/blog/news-updates-1/post/316l-metalpine-powder-as-quality-benchmark-27 [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Li, Y. Huang, C. Zou, and W. Tao, ‘Numerical study on powder stream characteristics of coaxial laser metal deposition nozzle’, Crystals (Basel), vol. 11, no. 3, Mar. 2021. doi:10.3390/cryst11030282. [Google Scholar]
  18. X. Gao, X. X. Yao, F. Y. Niu, and Z. Zhang, ‘The influence of nozzle geometry on powder flow behaviors in directed energy deposition additive manufacturing’, Advanced Powder Technology, vol. 33, no. 3, Mar. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.apt.2022.103487. [Google Scholar]
  19. Harald Dickler, ‘HighNo 4.0’. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://hd-sonderoptiken.de/fileadmin/documents/Produktblatt_-_HighNo_4.0.pdf [Google Scholar]
  20. Harald Dickler, ‘HighNo 13-6’. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://hd-sonderoptiken.de/fileadmin/files/Products/documents/Produktblatt_-_HighNo_13_-_6.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Zekovic, R. Dwivedi, and R. Kovacevic, ‘Numerical simulation and experimental investigation of gas-powder flow from radially symmetrical nozzles in laser-based direct metal deposition’, Int J Mach Tools Manuf, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 112–123, Jan. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.02.004. [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Ferreira, M. Dal, C. Colin, G. Marion, C. Gorny, D. Courapied, J. Guy, P. Peyre, ‘Experimental and numerical analysis of gas/powder flow for different LMD nozzles’, Metals (Basel), vol. 10, no. 5, May 2020. doi:10.3390/met10050667. [Google Scholar]
  23. Z. Liu, H. C. Zhang, S. Peng, H. Kim, D. Du, and W. Cong, ‘Analytical modeling and experimental validation of powder stream distribution during direct energy deposition’, Addit Manuf, vol. 30, Dec. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.100848. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology IWS, ‘LIsec-Nozzle Measuring System Instruction Manual’, Jul. 30, 2024. Accessed: Apr. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iws.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/iws/en/documents/publications/product-sheets/2024_Product-Sheet_LIsec_EN.pdf [Google Scholar]
  25. ALICAT Scientific, ‘STANDARD FLOW AND PRESSURE DEVICES’, Apr. 2024. Accessed: Apr. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://documents.alicat.com/manuals/DOC-MANUAL-MPL.pdf [Google Scholar]
  26. Sartorius, ‘Quintix® Pro’, 2023. Accessed: Feb. 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sartorius.com/download/1518854/analytical-balance-lab-weighing-quintix-pro-datasheet-en-sar-1--data.pdf [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.