Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 413, 2025
International Conference on Measurement, AI, Quality and Sustainability (MAIQS 2025)
Article Number 07010
Number of page(s) 6
Section Advances in Quality Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541307010
Published online 01 October 2025
  1. M. Xiaoyue, and F. Xv. An Exploratory Study of Information Re-Finding Behaviour Modes of Chinese College Students on Social Media: Video Diary Analysis from Chinese Platforms. Behaviour & Information Technology 44, no. 3, 596–610(2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2331261. [Google Scholar]
  2. T. L. L. Number of social media users in China 2023. Statista (2024). https://www.statista.com/statistics/278409/number-of-social-network-users-in-china/ [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Ke, and F. Bo. Exploring Generation Z’s Expectations at Future Work: The Impact of Digital Technology on Job Searching. European Journal of Training and Development 48, no. 9, 933–53(2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-05-2023-0076. [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Michael, C. Angèle, H. Jeffrey, H. Tatsunori, J. Chenyan, L. Michelle, M. Nicole, et al. Embedding Societal Values into Social Media Algorithms. Journal of Online Trust & Safety 2, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v2i1.148. [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Rajasree K, P. Audhesh, and S. Nancy. UserGenerated Content (UGC) Misclassification and Its Effects. The Journal of Consumer Marketing 37, no. 2, 125–38(2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-08-2018-2819. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Marcelo Luis Barbosa dos. The ‘so-Called’ UGC: An Updated Definition of User-Generated Content in the Age of Social Media. Online Information Review 46, no. 1, 95–113(2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2020-0258. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Avner, C. Augustin, K. Nitish, and L. Silvio. Filter & Follow: How Social Media Foster Content Curation. In Performance Evaluation Review, 42:43–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2637364.2592010. [Google Scholar]
  8. U. ilkay, and B. Mark A. How Digital Communications Contribute to Shaping the Career Paths of Youth: A Review Study Focused on Farming as a Career Option. Agriculture and Human Values 39, no. 4, 1491–1508 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10335-0. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Vegard, and S. Thea Bertnes. Advantages of Upper-Class Backgrounds: Forms of Capital, School Cultures and Educational Performance. The Sociological Review (Keele) 70, no. 6, 11991219 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261211061946. [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Po Keung. The Challenge of Developing a Business Ethics in China. Journal of Business Ethics 88, no. Suppl 1, 211–24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9820-2. [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Rui. Self and the Other in the Confucian Cultural Context: Implications of China's Higher Education Development for Comparative Studies. International Review of Education 57, no. 3-4, 337-4337-355 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9208-x. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Lindsey B, and K. Julie A. The Role of Social Networks in Getting a Job. Sociology Compass 5, no. 2, 165–78 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00353.x. [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Amy J, D. Daniel, and B. Nick. Career Funneling: How Elite Students Learn to Define and Desire 'Prestigious' Jobs. Sociology of Education 89, no. 1, 20–39 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040715610883. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Sally, B. Phillip, A. Annabelle, and T Gerbrand. Self, Career and Nationhood: The Contrasting Aspirations of British and French Elite Graduates. The British Journal of Sociology 64, no. 4, 578–96 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12048. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Chris. Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Perceptual Foundations. International Journal of Market Research 57, no. 6, 837–54 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2015-070. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Chittaranjan. The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 43, no. 1, 8688 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Naderifar, G. Fereshteh, and G. Hamideh. Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research. Strides in Development of Medical Education (Online) 14, no. 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670. [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Jeffrey M. Immersion-Crystallization: A Valuable Analytic Tool for Healthcare Research. Family Practice 39, no. 4, 785–89 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab158. [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Cam, K. Miner, D. Adame, S. Butler, L. McCormick, and E. Mendell. Internet Use for Health Information Among College Students. Journal of American College Health 53, no. 4, 183–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.53.4.183-188. [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Naif. Impact of Digital Media on Gifted Students' Career Choices. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 7, no. 2, 99112 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.555339. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Sarojini. How Do Aspirations Matter? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 17 (3), 324–41 (2016). doi:10.1080/19452829.2016.1199540. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.