EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 413 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 413 (2025) 06001 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 413, 2025
International Conference on Measurement, AI, Quality and Sustainability (MAIQS 2025)
Article Number 06001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Artificial Intelligence in Societies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541306001
Published online 01 October 2025
  1. M. Basha, Impact of artificial intelligence on marketing, East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) 2, 993 (2023).10.55927/ea-jmr.v2i3.3112 [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Islam, A. Miron, M. Nandy, J. Choudrie, X. Liu, Y. Li, Transforming digital marketing with generative ai, Computers 13, 168 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Islam, A. Miron, X. Liu, Y. Li, Deep learning in virtual try-on: A comprehensive survey, IEEE Access 12, 29475 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  4. Z.L. Bawm, R.P.D. Nath, A Conceptual Model for Effective Email Marketing, in 2014 17th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) (2014), pp. 250–256 [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Rahman, M.T. Chowdhury, M.I. Sumon, F.M. Mim, M. Rashid, R.U. Islam, M. Hasan, Analyzing A/B Testing Results in Digital Marketing, in 2024 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Internet of Things (AIBThings) (2024), pp. 1–5 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Gupta, K. Singh, R. Verma, Simulation: An effective marketing tool, International Journal of Computer Applications 4, 8 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Li, Y.Q. Chong, S. Stepputtis, J. Campbell, D. Hughes, M. Lewis, K. Sycara, Theory of mind for multi-agent collaboration via large language models (2024), 2310.10701, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10701 [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Kosinski, Evaluating large language models in theory of mind tasks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2405460121 (2024). 10.1073/pnas.2405460121 [Google Scholar]
  9. N.F. Fahrudin, R. Rindiyani, Comparison of k- medoids and k-means algorithms in segmenting customers based on rfm criteria, E3S Web of Conferences (2024).10.1051∕e3sconf∕202448402008 [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Roffo, A. Vinciarelli, Personality in Computational Advertising: A Benchmark, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Emotions and Personality in Personalized Services (EMPIRE) (ACM, Boston, MA, USA, 2016), http://giorgioroffo.it/?ADSdataset [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Jovic, S. Mnasri, Evaluating ai-generated emails: A comparative efficiency analysis, World Journal of English Language (2024).10.5430∕wjel.v14n2p502 [Google Scholar]
  12. S.O. Babatunde, O.A. Odejide, T.E. Edunjobi, D.O. Ogundipe, The role of ai in marketing personalization: A theoretical exploration of consumer engagement strategies, International Journal of Management Entrepreneurship Research (2024). 10.51594/ijmer.v6i3.964 [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Ma, X. Li, Z. Fan, J. Xu, J. Cho, P. Kanumala, K. Nag, S. Kumar, K. Achan, Triple modality fusion: Aligning visual, textual, and graph data with large language models for multi-behavior recommendations (2024), 2410.12228, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12228 [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Chen, E. Vankov, L. Baltrunas, P. Donovan, A. Mehta, B. Schroeder, M. Herman, Contextual Multi-Armed Bandit for Email Layout Recommendation, in Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (2023) [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Lyu, S. Jiang, H. Zeng, Y. Xia, Q. Wang, S. Zhang, R. Chen, C. Leung, J. Tang, J. Luo, Llm-rec: Personalized recommendation via prompting large language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15780 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  16. W. Wang, J. Wang, J. Guo, C. Xu, J. Li, H. Zhang, Z. Yang, M. Li, User behavior simulation with large language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05351 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  17. H.S. Zheng, S. Mishra, X. Chen, H.T. Cheng, E.H. Chi, Q.V. Le, D. Zhou, Step-back prompting enables reasoning via abstraction in large language models (2024), 2310.06117, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06117 [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Molchanova, A. Mikhailova, A. Korzanova, L. Ostyakova, A. Dolidze, Exploring the potential of large language models to simulate personality (2025), 2502.08265, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08265 [Google Scholar]
  19. N.I. Okeke, O.A. Alabi, A.N. Igwe, O.C. Ofodile, P.M. Ewim, Ai-driven personalization framework for smes: Revolutionizing customer engagement and retention, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews (2024). 10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.1.3208 [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Yehudai, L. Eden, A. Li, G. Uziel, Y. Zhao, R. Bar-Haim, A. Cohan, M. Shmueli-Scheuer, Survey on evaluation of llm-based agents (2025), 2503.16416, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16416 [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Gupta, Agnet: A novel ai agent network architecture, Lattice: The Machine Learning Journal 6, 32 (2025), iSSN No: 2582-8312. [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Chopra, S. Kumar, N.G. Kuru, R. Raskar, A. Quera-Bofarull, On the limits of agency in agent-based models (2024), 2409.10568, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10568 [Google Scholar]
  23. I.D. Hub, Retail customer segmentation dataset (2024), profiles customers based on demographics and shopping behavior for targeted marketing and personalization., https://huggingface.co/datasets/infinite-dataset-hub/RetailCustomerSegmentation [Google Scholar]
  24. V. Adlakha, P. BehnamGhader, X.H. Lu, N. Meade, S. Reddy, Evaluating correctness and faithfulness of instruction-following models for question answering (2024), 2307.16877, https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16877 [Google Scholar]
  25. Anthropic, Claude 3.5 haiku (2024), claude 3.5 Haiku is the next generation of our fastest model, improving across every skill set compared to its predecessors., https://www.anthropic.com/claude/haiku [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Clark, T. August, S. Serrano, N. Haduong, S. Gu-rurangan, N.A. Smith, All that’s ‘human’ is not gold: Evaluating human evaluation of generated text (2021), 2107.00061, https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00061 [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Inc, Crewai: Fast and flexible multi-agent automation framework (2025), accessed: 2025-03-24, https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI [Google Scholar]
  28. Y. Zhou, Z. Liu, Z. Dou, Boosting the potential of large language models with an intelligent information assistant (2024), 2411.06805, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06805 [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Zhang, J. Xiang, Z. Yu, F. Teng, X. Chen, J. Chen, M. Zhuge, X. Cheng, S. Hong, J. Wang, Aflow: Automating agentic workflow generation (2024), 2410.10762, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10762 [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Kaushik, V.D. Veer, S.A. Rasool, D.G.S.M. Sai, D.S. Keya, P. R., Enhancing Personalized Performance through a Deep Reinforcement LearningBased Recommendation System, in 2023 Global Conference on Information Technologies and Communications (GCITC) (2023), pp. 1–6 [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Amershi, D. Weld, M. Vorvoreanu, A. Fourney, B. Nushi, P. Collisson, J. Suh, S. Iqbal, P.N. Bennett, K. Inkpen et al., Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction, in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, 2019), pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233 [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Dereventsov, A. Bibin, Simulated Contextual Bandits for Personalization Tasks from Recommendation Datasets, in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW) (2022), pp. 1–6 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.