EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 413 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 413 (2025) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 413, 2025
International Conference on Measurement, AI, Quality and Sustainability (MAIQS 2025)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Artificial Intelligence and Measurement
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541303002
Published online 01 October 2025
  1. R. Bajcsy, Active perception. Proceedings of the IEEE 76, 966-1005 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Zeng, Y. Wen, W. Zhao, et al., View planning in robot active vision: A survey of systems, algorithms, and applications. Computational Visual Media 6, 225-245 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Border, N. Chebrolu, Y. Tao, J. D. Gammell, M. Fallon, Osprey: Multisession autonomous aerial mapping with LiDAR-based SLAM and next best view planning. IEEE Transactions on Field Robotics 1, 113-130 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  4. V. M. Respall, D. Devitt, R. Fedorenko, A. Klimchik, Fast sampling-based next-best-view exploration algorithm for a MAV, in Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Xi’an, China, May 30–June 5 (89), pp. 95-. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Kriegel, T. Bodenmüller, M. Suppa, G. Hirzinger, Efficient next-best-scan planning for autonomous 3D surface reconstruction of unknown objects. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing 10, 611-631 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Wang, T. Peng, W. Wang, et al., High-efficient view planning for surface inspection based on parallel deep reinforcement learning. Advanced Engineering Informatics 55, 101849 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Border, J. D. Gammell, The surface edge explorer (SEE): A measurement-direct approach to next best view planning. International Journal of Robotics Research 43, 1506-1532 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  8. J. I. Vásquez-Gómez, E. Löpez-Damián, L. E. Sucar, View planning for 3D object reconstruction, in Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), St. Louis, MO, USA, Oct. 11–15 (4015), pp. 4020-. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Peuzin-Jubert, A. Polette, D. Nozais, et al., Survey on the view planning problem for reverse engineering and automated control applications. Computer-Aided Design 141, 103094 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Devrim Kaba, M. Gokhan Uzunbas, S. Nam Lim, A reinforcement learning approach to the view planning problem, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA, July 21–26 (6933), pp. 6941-. [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Zeng, W. Zhao, Y.-J. Liu, PC-NBV: A point cloud based deep network for efficient next best view planning, in Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA, Oct. 25–29 (7050), pp. 7057-. [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Landgraf, B. Meese, M. Pabst, et al., A reinforcement learning approach to view planning for automated inspection tasks. Sensors 21, 2030 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Peralta, J. Casimiro, A. M. Nilles, J. A. Aguilar, R. Atienza, R. Cajote, Next-best view policy for 3D reconstruction, in Computer Vision –ECCV 2020 Workshops, A. Bartoli, A. Fusiello (eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12538, Springer, Cham (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Wang, W. Xi, Y. Cheng, H. Han, Y. Yang, RL- NBV: A deep reinforcement learning based nextbest-view method for unknown object reconstruction. Pattern Recognition Letters 184, 1-6 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  15. X. Chen, Q. Li, T. Wang, et al., GenNBV: Generalizable next-best-view policy for active 3D reconstruction, in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, June 17–21 (2024), pp. 16436–16445. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, et al., Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Kim, H.G. Chi, X. Hu, Q. Huang, K. Ramani, A large-scale annotated mechanical components benchmark for classification and retrieval tasks with deep neural networks, in Computer Vision –ECCV 2020, A. Vedaldi, H. Bischof, T. Brox, J.M. Frahm (eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12363, Springer, Cham (2020). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.