EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 411 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 411 (2025) 03004 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 411, 2025
Joint 14th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM2024) and 5th Zaytoonah Engineering Conference (ZEC2024)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 13
Section Project Management, Organizational, and Safety Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541103004
Published online 05 September 2025
  1. R. Suddaby, Editor's comments: Why theory? Acad. Manag. Rev. 39(4), 407-411 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0252 [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Lynham, General method of theory building in applied disciplines. In: R. Swanson, T. Chermack (eds) Theory building in applied disciplines, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, 31-45 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Swanson, T. Chermack, Foundations and definitions of theory building. In: R. Swanson, T. Chermack (eds), Theory building in applied disciplines, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, 14-31 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  4. B.G. Glaser, A.L. Strauss, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, (Aldine, Chicago, 1967). [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Jones, G. Noble, Grounded theory and management research: A lack of integrity? Qual. Res. Organ. Manag. Int. J. 2(2), 84-103 (2007). http://doi.org/10.1108/17465640710778502 [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Suddaby, From the Editors: What grounded theory is not. Acad. Manag. J. 49(4), 633-642 (2006). http://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083020 [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Sandhu, C.T. Kulik, Shaping and being shaped: How organizational structure and managerial discretion co-evolve in new managerial roles. Adm. Sci. Q. 64(3), 619-658 (2019). http://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218778018 [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Mellahi, A. Wilkinson, Organizational failure: A critique of recent research and a proposed integrative framework. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 5-6(1), 21-41 (2004). http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00095.x [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Kindström, P. Carlborg, T. Nord, Challenges for growing SMEs: A managerial perspective. J. Small Bus. 62(2), 700-723 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2022.2082456 [Google Scholar]
  10. P.F. Drucker, Management challenges for the 21st century, 1st ed, (Routledge, London, 2007). [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Schneider, Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: An empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field. Rev. Manag. Sci. 12, 803-848 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0283-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Hoque, M.R. Uddin, Md. Ibrahim, A. Mamun, Corporate social responsibilities (CSR) as a means of materializing corporate vision: A Volvo Group approach. Asian Soc. Sci. 10(11), 258-268 (2014). http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n11p258 [Google Scholar]
  13. E.E. Kossek, M. Lee, Implementing a reduced-workload arrangement to retain high talent: A case study. Psychol.-Manag. J. 11(1), 49-64 (2008). http://doi.org/10.1080/10887150801966995 [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Wilczewska, J. Nazarko, A comprehensive framework for examining managerial challenges: Insights from empirical study, J. Bus. Econ. Manag. (to be published) [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Kolbaek, Improve business results by learning from experience in proactive reviews: Find solutions to complex problems. In: M. Mupepi, R. Costello (eds) Strategic collaborative innovations in organizational systems, IGI Global, Hershey, 5279 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  16. K.Z. Kapuscihska, M. Matejun, Managerial challenges of management control system implementation in public organizations. Przeglad Organizacji 3, 47-53 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Walker, F. Myrick, Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qual. Health Res. 16(4), 547-560 (2006). http://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285972 [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Wilczewska, J. Nazarko, Developing grounded theory systematic approach for logistics and supply chain management research. J. Bus. Logist. 45(4), e12396 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1111/jbl. 12396 [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Urquhart, H. Lehmann, M.D. Myers, Putting the 'theory' back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Inf. Syst. J. 20(4), 357i381 (2010). http://doi.org/10.1111365-2575.2009.00328.x [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, W.M. Lim, How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 133(C), 285-296 (2021). http://doi.org/10.1016/jjbusres.2021.04.070 [Google Scholar]
  21. K.J. Emich, S. Kumar, L. Lu, K. Norder, N. Pandey, Mapping 50 years of small group research through small group research. Small Group Res. 51(6), 659-699 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420934541 [Google Scholar]
  22. R.J. Torraco, Writing integrative reviews of the literature: Methods and purposes. Int. J. Adult Vocat. Educ. Technol. 7(3), 62-70 (2016). http://doi.org/10.4018/IJAVET.2016070106 [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Whittemore, K. Knafl, The integrative review: Updated methodology. J. Adv. Nurs. 52(2), 546-553 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x [Google Scholar]
  24. N.J. van Eck, L. Waltman, VOSviewer manual. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.20, Universiteit Leiden, CWTS (2023). [Google Scholar]
  25. L. Worrall, K. Harris, R. Stewart, A. Thomas, P. McDermott, Barriers to women in the UK construction industry. Eng. Const. Arch. Man. 17(3), 268-281 (2010). http://doi.org/10.1108/09699981011038060 [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Vithayaporn, The influence of cultural differences on gender issues in tourism and hospitality employment: A grounded theory analysis. Asian J. Bus. Res. 13(2), 86-106 (2023). http://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.230151 [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Lenz, M. Pinhanez, L. Cesaris, C. Jacobs, Open innovation and the challenges of human resource management. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 20(7), 1650063 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616500638 [Google Scholar]
  28. J.A. Marin-Garcia, A. Juarez-Tarraga, C. Santandreu-Mascarell, Kaizen philosophy: The keys of the permanent suggestion systems analyzed from the workers' perspective. TQM J. 30(4), 296-320 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0176 [Google Scholar]
  29. I. Giroux, Problem solving in small firms: An interpretive study. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 16(1), 167-184 (2009). http://doi.org/10.1108/14626000910932944 [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Sithambaram, M.H.N. Nasir, R. Ahmad, Issues and challenges impacting the successful management of agile-hybrid projects: A grounded theory approach. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 39, 474-495 (2021). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  31. R. Hoda, L.K. Murugesan, Multi-level agile project management challenges: A self-organizing team perspective. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 245-257 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/jjss.2016.02.049 [Google Scholar]
  32. N. Ahrend, F. Pittke, H. Leopold, Barriers and strategies of process knowledge sharing in public sector organizations. In: D. Kundisch, L. Suhl, L. Beckmann (eds) Proceedings of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Paderborn, Germany, 571583 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  33. J.P. Gerlach, N. Eling, N. Wessels, P. Buxmann, Flamingos on a slackline: Companies' challenges of balancing the competing demands of handling customer information and privacy. Inf. Syst. J. 29, 548-575 (2019). http://doi.org/10.1111/isJ. 12222 [Google Scholar]
  34. L. Siddique, B. Hussein, Enablers and barriers to customer involvement in agile software projects in the Norwegian software industry: The supplier's perspective. J. Mod. Proj. Manag. 7(2), 172-195 (2019). http://doi.org/10.19255/jmpm395 [Google Scholar]
  35. J.R. Schumm, P.M. Ralston, M.A. Schwieterman, The challenges of supply side obsolescence: Obsolescence procurement's past, present, and future. Transp. J. 63, 723 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1002/tjo3.12005 [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Ghahramani, Factors that influence the maintenance and improvement of OHSAS 18001 in adopting companies: A qualitative study. J. Clean. Prod. 137, 283-290 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2016.07.087 [Google Scholar]
  37. A.-R. Amidu, D. Boyd, Expert problem solving practice in commercial property valuation: An exploratory study. J. Prop. Invest. Finance 36(4), 366-382 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-05-2017-0037 [Google Scholar]
  38. E. Soja, P. Soja, Fostering ICT use by older workers: Lessons from perceptions of barriers to enterprise system adoption. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 33(2), 407-434 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2018-0282 [Google Scholar]
  39. S. Shojaei, M. Motavaseli, A. Bitaab, H. Chitsazan, G.M. Elyasi, Institutional barriers to venture capital financing: An explorative study for the case of Iran. J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ. 10(3), 409-427 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-01-2018-0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. T. Kähkönen, A. Maglyas, K. Smolander, ERP system integration: An inter-organizational challenge in the dynamic business environment. In: J. Cordeiro, S. Hammoudi, L. Maciaszek, O. Camp, J. Filipe (eds), Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 227, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 39-56 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-31922348-3 3 [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Bick, K. Spohrer, R. Hoda, A. Scheerer, A. Heinzl, Coordination challenges in large-scale software development: A case study of planning misalignment in hybrid settings. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 44(10), 932-950 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2017.2730870 [Google Scholar]
  42. F.P. Seth, O. Taipale, K. Smolander, Organizational and customer related challenges of software testing: An empirical study in 11 software companies. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, Marrakech, Morocco, 1-12 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2014.6861031 [Google Scholar]
  43. S. Jantunen, D.C. Gause, Using a grounded theory approach for exploring software product management challenges. J. Syst. Softw. 95, 32-51 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1016/jjss.2014.03.050 [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Cronholm, H. Göbel, P. Rittgen, Challenges concerning data-driven innovation. In: ACIS 2017 Proceedings, IEEE, Hobart, 1-11 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  45. T.-M. Ly-Le, The entrepreneurial journey in Vietnam's public relations industry: The motivation, the role and the challenges. J. Manag. Dev. 42, 76-90 (2023). http://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-04-2022-0101 [Google Scholar]
  46. S. Perks, Problem-solving techniques of growing very small businesses. J. Enterp. Communities 4(3), 220-233 (2010). http://doi.org/10.1108/17506201011068228 [Google Scholar]
  47. J. Liao, Z. Jiang, Z. Chen, Cultural barriers against electronic businesses in globalization. In: 2011 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, IEEE, Shenzhen, China, November 26-27, 407-410 (2011). http://doi.org/10.1109/ICIII.2011.243 [Google Scholar]
  48. T. de Vass, H. Shee, S. Miah, IoT in supply chain management: Opportunities and challenges for businesses in early Industry 4.0 context. Oper. Suppl. Chain Manag. : Int. J. 14(2), 148-161 (2021). http://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0450293 [Google Scholar]
  49. S. Meager, V. Kumar, B. Ekren, D. Paddeu, Exploring the drivers and barriers to green supply chain management implementation: A study of independent UK restaurants. Procedia Manuf. 51, 1642-1649 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.229 [Google Scholar]
  50. J. Rauer, L. Kaufmann, Mitigating external barriers to implementing green supply chain management: A grounded theory investigation of green-tech companies' rare earth metals supply chains. J. Supply Chain Manag. 51(2), 65-88 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1111/jscm. 12063 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.