Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 407, 2025
19e Congrès de la Société Française de Génie des Procédés (SFGP2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 18 | |
| Section | Méthodes & outils au service des procédés / Methods & Tools for Processes | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202540704003 | |
| Published online | 04 March 2025 | |
- Catté, M., Dussap, C.-G., Gros, J.-B., 1995. A physical chemical UNIFAC model for aqueous solutions of sugars. Fluid Phase Equilibria 105, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(94)02604-Y [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Domalski, E.S., Hearing, E.D., 1996. Heat Capacities and Entropies of Organic Compounds in the Condensed Phase. Volume III. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 25, 1. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555985 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gowers, R., Linke, M., Barnoud, J., Reddy, T., Melo, M., Seyler, S., Domanski, J., Dotson, D., Buchoux, S., Kenney, I., Beckstein, O., 2016. MDAnalysis: A Python Package for the Rapid Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Presented at the Python in Science Conference, Austin, Texas, pp. 98–105. https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-629e541a-00e [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Grigera, J.R., 1988. Conformation of polyols in water. Molecular-dynamics simulation of mannitol and sorbitol. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 184, 2603. https://doi.org/10.1039/f19888402603 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jorgensen, W.L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J.D., Impey, R.W., Klein, M.L., 1983. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. The Journal of Chemical Physics 79, 926–935. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445869 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kearsley, M.W., Deis, R.C., 2006. Sorbitol and Mannitol, in: Mitchell, H. (Ed.), Sweeteners and Sugar Alternatives in Food Technology. Wiley, pp. 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996003.ch13 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Klamt, A., Schüürmann, G., 1993. COSMO: a new approach to dielectric screening in solvents with explicit expressions for the screening energy and its gradient. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 799–805. https://doi.org/10.1039/P29930000799 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kony, D., Damm, W., Stoll, S., Van Gunsteren, W.F., 2002. An improved OPLS-AA force field for carbohydrates. J Comput Chem 23, 1416–1429. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10139 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lian, Y.-N., Chen, A.-T., Suurkuusk, J., Wadso, I., 1982. Polyol - Water Interactions as Reflected by Aqueous Heat Capacity Values. Acta Chemica Scandinavia A36, 735–739. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Politi, R., Sapir, L., Harries, D., 2009. The Impact of Polyols on Water Structure in Solution: A Computational Study. J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 7548–7555. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9010026 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tong, B., Liu, R.-B., Meng, C.-G., Yu, F.-Y., Ji, S.-H., Tan, Z.-C., 2010. Heat Capacities and Nonisothermal Thermal Decomposition Reaction Kinetics of D-Mannitol. J. Chem. Eng. Data 55, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1021/je900285w [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tong, B., Tan, Z.C., Shi, Q., Li, Y.S., Wang, S.X., 2008. Thermodynamic investigation of several natural polyols (II): Heat capacities and thermodynamic properties of sorbitol. J Therm Anal Calorim 91, 463–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-007-8361-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Toure, O., Lebert, A., Dussap, C.-G., 2016. Extension of the COSMO-RS-PDHS model to the prediction of activity coefficients in concentrated (water-electrolyte) and (water-polyol) solutions. Fluid Phase Equilibria 424, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2015.11.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Xu, H., Stern, H.A., Berne, B.J., 2002. Can Water Polarizability Be Ignored in Hydrogen Bond Kinetics? J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 2054–2060. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp013426o [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.